Applications for extradition were accepted in 12 cases.

For persons being prosecuted, the law allowed extradition for all offences constituting crimes under the laws of the requesting State.

Submission details

Surveillance of deliveries

(a) Controlled delivery?

(c) In the absence of a treaty between Qatar and another State, the Convention against Torture serves as the basis for extradition to other States which have signed the Convention.

Extradition shall be subject to the other conditions provided by the law of the requested State.

terms of delivery and payment

Extradition shall be in order only where the offence has been committed within the territorial jurisdiction of the requesting country, except where offences of international reach are involved.

(c) the actual place of delivery is one of the optional places of delivery under the contract and is located in a Contracting State, or

The latter, however, refused to accept that his old letter of resignation had any validity, let alone that Terzić had the authority to dismiss him.

Unless otherwise provided in the Instrument, the time of delivery and the place of delivery means the time and the place agreed to in the contract of carriage, or, failing any specific provision relating to the delivery of the goods in such contract, the time and place that is in accordance with the customs, practices, or usages in the trade.

Grounds for refusing to extradite a person (article 493)

Providing for a definition of delivery is not that easy.

The Commission decided to include in its current programme of work one new topic, namely obligation to extradite or prosecute (aut dedere aut judicare)

It declared that it would render cooperation on extradition on the legal basis provided under the Extradition Act of 1992 of Malaysia.

I signed the extradition papers.

Iraq and Kuwait are ready to undertake the handover.

Belarus stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty and it would use the Convention as a basis for cooperation on the issues of extradition with other States parties.

Belgium stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty and that it took the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

However, in such cases, extradition will be subject to other conditions set forth in Qatari law, if the State of Qatar is the requesting State.

Azerbaijan stated that extradition was not conditional on the existence of a treaty and that it would use the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

Cyprus stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty and that it took the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

Egypt stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty and that it took the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

Latvia stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty and that it took the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

Malta stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty and that it would take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

The Russian Federation stated that, on the basis of reciprocity, it would take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties. Slovakia stated that extradition was not conditional on the existence of a treaty.

Spain stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty and that it did not take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties. Sweden stated that extradition was not conditional on the existence of a treaty.

( 244) 430970

For States bound to Burkina Faso by a cooperation agreement or convention, those texts were applicable in their relations. For States not bound to Burkina Faso by an agreement or convention on judicial cooperation, the text that applied in the case of a request for extradition was the legislative act of 10 March 1927 on the extradition of foreigners.

Only performed in the last rakat of a prayer.

(5) The offence for which extradition is requested is a military offence

Lesotho stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty.

Myanmar stated that extradition was not conditional on the existence of a treaty.

Slovenia stated that it would take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

South Africa stated that extradition was not conditional on the existence of a treaty.

Mutual legal assistance (art. 18, para.

Angola stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty and that it did not take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

Jamaica stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty and that it did not take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

Panama stated that it would take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties. Paraguay stated that it would take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) stated that the Convention would be taken as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition in relations between the Bolivarian Republic and other States.

8. Extradition shall be subject to the conditions provided for by the domestic law of the requested State Party or by applicable extradition treaties, including, inter alia, conditions in relation to the minimum penalty requirement for extradition and the grounds upon which the requested State Party may refuse extradition.

Bahrain stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty in Bahrain and that it took the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

Estonia stated that extradition was not conditional on the existence of a treaty and that it would take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

Austria stated that extradition was not conditional on the existence of a treaty.