Iraq stated that the claimant did not provide proof of his alleged personal losses.

At the Panel's direction, the company was contacted regarding the claimant's alleged loss.

Third, the Panel must determine the amount of any compensable loss suffered by the claimant and recommend an award in respect thereof.

The claimant seeks compensation for losses suffered in connection with a wholesale food business located in Kuwait in the amount of USD 24,763,322.

The claimant advances a claim totalling USD 12,256,896 for departure related losses and business losses allegedly sustained in connection with two clothing businesses in Kuwait.

The claimant seeks USD 13,192,938 for personal property losses and business losses sustained in connection with five scrap and auto parts businesses in Kuwait.

In the first set of competing claims, a Palestinian claimant and a Kuwaiti claimant filed separate claims in categories D and C respectively for the losses of the same car repair business in Kuwait.

Iraq argues that governments can only submit claims before the Commission for losses that they have sustained directly, and that they may not seek compensation for losses suffered by individuals.

The Panel reviewed the file and concluded that the correct amount of compensation recommended for the claimant's D2 losses should have been USD 316,177.62.

The claim unit reviewed in this report is for compensation for the loss incurred as a result of the damage to subtidal habitats until they recover to pre invasion conditions.

This claimant seeks compensation in the amount of USD 171,000,600 for D8 D9 business losses allegedly sustained by his unincorporated business as a direct result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

The second claim unit is for medical treatment costs and other losses to persons suffering from post traumatic stress disorder as a result of exposure to hostilities and various acts of violence by Iraqi forces during the invasion and occupation.

The E4 Panel recommended no compensation for the claim when it was originally reviewed, as the E4 claimant had not submitted sufficient information or documents to support its asserted losses.

The Panel also recommends no compensation for the personal property loss alleged as the claimant made inconsistent statements regarding how the loss occurred and did not provide sufficient credible evidence to prove his ownership of the personal property.

The individual claimant whose claim had been identified as potentially overlapping with the E4 claim provided additional evidence and claimed for losses in addition to those losses claimed by the E4 claimant.

He explained that the claim for the payment of relief related to the costs he incurred in evacuating foreign nationals employed in Iraq during the period from December 1990 to February 1991 and in compensating Iraqi employees who remained in Iraq.

They therefore more accurately reflect the losses incurred by the agricultural producers.

No overlap due to the nature of the loss asserted

The individual claimant whose claim had been identified as potentially overlapping with the E4 claim provided additional evidence (motor vehicle deregistration certificates) and claimed for losses in addition to those losses claimed by the E4 claimant.

Iraq argues that although some invasion related wildlife losses occurred, Saudi Arabia has failed to provide baseline data on wildlife populations (except for shorebirds), and has also failed to provide any monitoring and assessment data to support the claim.

The corporate detainee claims allege company losses aggregating KWD 3,197,757 (approximately USD 11,064,903).

Sixth claim unit Claim preparation costs Iran seeks compensation in the amount of USD 4,500,000 for administrative, technical and legal expenses of the preparation of this claim.

The fifth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

Fifth claim unit Claim preparation costs Iran seeks compensation in the amount of USD 51,075 for project implementation costs.

Third claim unit Claim preparation costs Jordan seeks compensation in the amount of USD 1,700,000 for claim preparation costs for its fourth and fifth F4 instalment claims, including its public health claim.

Second claim unit Claim preparation costs Saudi Arabia seeks compensation in the amount of USD 5,874 for claim preparation costs.

At the request of Saudi Arabia, the secretariat incorporated that claim in the current claim (Claim No. 5000463).

The E4 Panel recommended no compensation for the claim when it was originally reviewed, as the E4 claimant had not submitted sufficient information or documents to support its asserted losses.

The sixth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The third claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

Some of these identifiers are included in the claim form submitted by the claimant the remaining data is taken from the evidence provided by a claimant either in the original claim or in response to claim development notifications.

The first claim unit is for reduction in crop yields and the second claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

Summary of recommended awards for the claims of Iran 58

The deferred part of claim No. 5000379 has been included in claim No. 5000301.

The Panel considers that this claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

Jordan claims an amount of USD 102,962,079 for expenses incurred in treating low birth weight infants and an amount of USD 51,710,096 for costs incurred in treating malnourished children.

Overlapping claim

UNCC claim No. 3011623.

UNCC claim No. 1810440.

The seventh claim file was not transmitted to Iraq as the claimant objected to such transmission.

The losses incurred by domestic investors can have a long term effect on the pension system or the banking sector.

UNCC claim No. 3012161

UNCC claim No. 3011290

UNCC claim No. 3011328

UNCC claim No. 3010941