This hypothesis was an important step in disproving the ancient assumption that atoms were indivisible.

Infringement is a lot easier to disprove.

Why are you trying to distort everything I say?

You can't refute facts.

And they start up that path by accepting a core proposition, and that proposition is the following

And in entrepreneurship, that assumption breaks down.

We are even better at refuting potential explanations.

This assumption implies these two things.

We believe that UNCITRAL's standard usage of the words of presumption refer to a rebuttable presumption.

That assumption appeared plausible.

In fact, the history of technology has repeatedly refuted this pessimistic view.

You've really got to just throw your assumptions out the door.

And they start up that path by accepting a core proposition, and that proposition is the following Lying is a cooperative act.

Warning Assuming normal speed.

The data clearly supports this view.

Presumption relating to the time of dispatch of an electronic communication

That assumption appears to be closer to reality.

We don't even have to make that assumption.

All these programs refute three widely held myths.

In fact, the evidence does not always support this assumption.

This presumption is almost certainly mistaken.

I have called this presumption a quasi Marxist fallacy.

In fact, this is partly the case.

Well that's clearly not the case, they intersect.

Is this proposition true? Is this theory a good theory?

In short Far from refuting religion, the Neo Darwinists have helped us understand why it matters.

Since she was not informed, she was unable to contest the allegations contained in the application and refute them.

Different ways of looking at her models, at her statistics, different ways of crunching the data in order to disprove her.

So it can be assumed that the rest still stands.

Let's test this assumption by heading over to Eastern Europe.

Because if they were, then we would contradict the given assumption.

It's logical to assume that she wasn't wearing them in bed.

It starts from the basic proposition that nobody is trustworthy.

Paragraph 7 of article 12 draws the attention of States parties to the reversal of the burden of proof in respect of the lawful origin of proceeds, an approach that eases the difficulty for law enforcement authorities to prove that assets are derived from crime by establishing a presumption to that effect and leaving it to the offender to rebut the presumption.

Although crisis hotlines are common there is little evidence to support or refute their effectiveness.

That assumption is the heart of democracy it is a revolution for diplomacy.

An underlying assumption of the panel's recommendations was that appropriate supporting national legislation would be in place.

That realization is extraordinarily corrosive, extraordinarily corrupting.

Dr. Bino Gutenburg then made the natural suggestion to plot the amplitudes logarithmically.

Viewed from this perspective, countering terrorism includes rebutting terrorist propaganda with a strategic communications campaign.

But this would ignore a fundamental asymmetry between advanced and emerging countries.

To give this presumption teeth, it should be included in international trade and investment agreements.

But in truth, we have no idea.

Using this assumption, he was able to explain some properties of light.

This brings me to the third, and perhaps most problematic, assumption