Supposition?

the presumption of innocence

Just suppose.

But just suppose.

Presumption of nationality

is far too optimistic.

That is an assumption that needs challenging.

The presumption of innocence must be respected

But Moses supposes erroneously

I have a better suppose, Sabrina.

It's an assumption that modernity is a product simply of competition, markets and technology.

No proposition Euclid wrote,

The right to the presumption of innocence

Furthermore, many other rights are conferred upon individuals, including the right to a fair and due process.

I thanked her, assuming it was fake,

This finds its explanation in the presumption of innocence principle.

I realize that's an ambiguous statement.

Assuming we are in scenario E.

Or is that a farfetched supposition?

This, as we all know, was a mistaken assumption.

We see it as a virtual AND physical proposition .

An available, working network connection will be assumed

And Sherif Khairy reasons This draft law is naïve, to say the least.

Historical cost is based on the stable measuring unit assumption.

The better thing is to just start from your base assumptions.

Assuming he was good. We don't know.

The assumption that she won't leave you is what can depress you.

So just that by itself, is very, very scary proposition.

Harmony is the suggestion of a thing that is much larger than resolution.

I think always, Suppose I fail ... and then I am frightened.

No assumption is needed for discrete events.

What's the volume assuming that the height is h.

Assuming that I've let's say 8 centimeters of water.

I have some function and I'm assuming that the partial of

The false assumption of separation through the rejection of the symbiotic relationship of life.

So we'll just assume that that is our psi.

My velocity is actually 100 meters per second down I could have assumed the opposite.

Of course, one can only hope that such a scenario remains pure conjecture.

Explosion proof electrical equipment should be used in such a bunker to minimise the risk of ignition.

We simply cannot just assume that 1 0 equals infinity.

And then I'm going to assume that this is f of x.

So assuming I don't have to spend the money today

I'll get out of here around noon. Supposedly fishing.

I can't suppose that when I know perfectly well who you are.

But that is merely another erroneous (not to mention amoral) assumption.