The Court held the wording to be sufficiently broad to include tort claims, thus concluding for the power of the arbitral tribunal to award damages in tort.

(e) The tort of passing off

(f) Defences and remedies under the tort of passing off.

Looking at the situation today in many jurisdictions, this is something that is regulated by general tort law.

The first involve an action for tort because the State allows the SGP to exist.

However, the judge found that the claim did not bring into question the CISG since it was put forward in tort.

Furthermore, traditional tort law does not protect people who are captured by a photograph in public because this is not counted as an invasion of privacy.

And the total of direct tort cost in this country is about two percent, which is twice as much as in other countries but, as taxes go, hardly crippling.

The average number of loss types is 3.14 for the claims in this instalment, compared with 2.01 for all claims in the regular category D claims programme, 1.93 for Jordanian claims and 1.71 for Kuwaiti claims.

The respondent also argued before the enforcement court that the arbitral tribunal lacked jurisdiction for the reason that the arbitral award dealt with damages in tort as well as in contract.

review of non overlapping claims in the FOURTHsecond group of overlapping claims

These E4 claims were considered in the second instalment of E4 claims.

The average amount claimed for the claims in this instalment is about USD 2 million, compared to about USD 820,000 for all claims, about USD 934,000 for Jordanian claims and about USD 861,000 for Kuwaiti claims in the regular category D claims programme.

In addition, the searches identified 287 E4 claims in the remaining E4 instalments as potentially overlapping with 168 claims in category C and 203 claims in category D .

These claims have been recognized only between the countries making claims in the area.

Second instalment category A claims corrections Third instalment category A claims corrections Fourth instalment category A claims corrections Fifth instalment category A claims corrections Sixth instalment category A claims corrections First instalment category C claims corrections Fourth instalment category C claims corrections

Of the 24 company claims in this instalment, 19 are stand alone claims four are corporate detainee claims and one is an E2 claim.

The searches identified 104 E4 claims with approved awards of compensation in the first seven instalments as potentially overlapping with 61 claims in category C and 70 claims in category D .

The fourthsecond group of overlapping claims initially consisted of E4 claims related to 39seven category C claims and 24 category C and D claims.

Claims preparation costs A number of category D claimants have made claims for claims preparation costs incurred by them, either in amounts specified on the claim form or in general terms.

According to section 1 of chapter 5 of the Finnish Damages and Tort Liability Act of 1974, damages shall constitute compensation for the personal injury and damage to property.

Claims

The Panel reviewed approximately 160 D4 (personal property) claims and 70 D4 (motor vehicles) claims in this instalment.

In general, territorial claims below the 60 S parallel have only been recognised among those countries making claims in the area.

Category A corrections higher to lower amounts Family to individual The Government of the Philippines reported that 17 claims originally filed as family claims were in fact individual claims.

The secretariat has also used these electronic searches for duplicate claims in the Palestinian late claims programme, the Bedouin programme and the category A and C late claims programme.

Summary of claims in the thirtieth instalment

As stated above, the eligible category D Palestinian late claims have a higher incidence of loss types and higher amounts claimed than claims in the regular category D claims programme, giving rise to a potential risk of overstatement of the claims.

Therefore the Palestinian Panel determined that these two claims were ineligible for inclusion in the Palestinian late claims programme.

Details of the claims or parts of claims that were deferred from previous F4 instalments or transferred from other claims categories are discussed in the relevant sections of this report.

In total, over 45,000 duplicate claims in category A claims had been corrected through the mechanisms designed by the category A Panel.

Duplicate claims

Concerning the issue of duplicate claims, the secretariat indicated that it was aware of the risk of duplicate claims from the outset of claims processing and took steps to identify and eliminate such claims during the course of claims processing.

Although the category D Panel (the D' Panel ) began its review of claims in 1996, the first five instalments of category D claims did not include any claims for business losses.

A preliminary examination of these claims revealed that some, but not all, of the Kuwaiti companies in issue had filed claims with the Commission, which were being processed as E4 claims.

The Palestinian Panel determined that 17 of the 19 claims were eligible for inclusion in the Palestinian late claims programme.

Of these claims, the Panel recommends awards of compensation for two claims, while no awards are recommended for the remaining 16 claims.

Legal issues In reviewing the claims in the fifth F4 instalment, the Panel considered a number of legal issues relating to the claims.

Soon after the Panel commenced its review of the eligible category D Palestinian late claims , it became apparent that this claims population exhibits certain features that were not present in the claims in the regular category D claims programme or, if present, were not present to the same degree.

Although the D1 Panel began its review of claims in 1996, the first five instalments of category D claims submitted to the D1 Panel did not include any claims for business losses.

Having concluded that this consolidated claim, in effect consists of 82 claims, comprising 67 managing agent and 15 insurance company claims,

As stated above, the eligible category D Palestinian late claims have a higher number of loss types per claim and substantially higher amounts claimed than claims in the regular category D claims programme.

Admissibility of claims

(e) Medical claims

Stand alone claims