We could not agree more.

We entirely agree with this.

Others question the efficacy of market based approaches to drive sustainability, because markets can never deliver optimal social and environmental outcomes.

We agree with the Secretary General that

We do not share this view.

We agree with Rosemary Abi Saab

We agree that they merit a proper place in our system.

We agree that the world needs to be steered towards a greater focus on those larger freedoms.

We agree that moving resources from one place to another cannot be the raison d être of a political entity.

As noted above, we agree with the basic premise that the court should be conceived as a flexible, supplementary facility, based on consent.

We certainly agree with this recommendation insofar as it emphasizes the relevance of ensuring respect for human rights as an important pillar of both conflict prevention and peace building.

We agree to ensure stronger system wide coherence by implementing the following measures at the policy, operational and humanitarian as well as international environmental governance, levels

research shows that there is a convergence between the protection offered by human rights law and that of international humanitarian law.

We agree with the view that the present state of international law shows that together, humanitarian law and human rights instruments offer a comprehensive set of norms and procedures for the prevention, implementation and repression of acts of torture.

We concur with the Panel's finding that it is imperative to develop a global strategy for fighting terrorism that addresses root causes and strengthens responsible States and the rule of law as well as fundamental human rights.

We wholeheartedly agree with the Secretary General that the United Nations can and must be a representative and efficient world organization, open and accountable to the public as well as to Governments (A 59 PV.83, p. 3).

In particular, as the Afghan authorities have emphasized and we agree with their assessment community based development and basic infrastructure are important areas that should receive high priority in the consolidation of peace in Afghanistan.

We may agree with Smith (and Shakespeare) about the uselessness of lawyers perhaps, but surely not about Olivier, Falstaff, and Pavarotti.

We could not agree more.

Why is this subject, Your Excellency? Didn't we agree to stop the subject?

We agree with the observation that globalization creates both opportunities and challenges.

For those reasons, particular attention should be focused on those grievances and on their origin.

We fully agree with the assessments that have been made, and we understand that difficulties are being encountered by the Commission.

Without agreeing the terms of the debate, it is difficult to discuss these important issues.

We will not always agree on all proposals, and we will continue to judge proposals on their merits.

Finally, we agree that we should make significant institutional and functional changes to the Commission on Human Rights.

And it seems like kind of an admirable philosophy at first something we might all agree to sign onto ...

With respect to nuclear weapons, we also agree that the non proliferation regime is at a critical point.

We agree with those who believe that we must improve conventional methods of fisheries management.

We should agree on the comprehensive convention on combating terrorism without delay during this session of the General Assembly.

We all agree that development, in particular sustainable development, is fundamental to the achievement of international peace and security.

as sorrowful, yet always rejoicing as poor, yet making many rich as having nothing, and yet possessing all things.

As sorrowful, yet alway rejoicing as poor, yet making many rich as having nothing, and yet possessing all things.

We should celebrate these achievements even as we recognize that serious problems remain to be resolved. There are different perspectives on how Europe s security architecture should be designed, but we all agree on the urgent need to tackle this critical challenge through constructive dialogue.

All of us (including cartoonists) agree that cartoons are a powerful tool of communication.

We agree to ensure the effective monitoring and enforcement of United Nations arms embargoes.

With regard to security issues, we agree that continued efforts are required to deal with the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

Finally, we fully endorse the need for an expanded Security Council that is more representative of the realities of today's world.

We also need to agree on the agenda of the substantive session of the Disarmament Commission as soon as possible.

Here, we agree with the Secretary General's analysis, especially when he sketches the bleak and alarming picture that is Côte d'Ivoire today.

as unknown, and yet well known as dying, and behold, we live as punished, and not killed

As unknown, and yet well known as dying, and, behold, we live as chastened, and not killed

So, why is it, that if we think that we all agree that we need a better world, we need a more just world, why is it that we are not using the one language that has consistently showed us that we can break down barriers, that we can reach people?

We disagree with many of its contents, of course, but also oppose the idea of having an EU constitution at all.

This implies that AWF has a higher expected cost than RWT, because there are a lot of false positives and or the cure is worse than the disease.