Proceedings

The facts

Proceedings

At the same time, the IAPWG concurred that further validation of fact and analysis was required in order for JIU to support its recommendations.

The facts as presented

The facts as presented

The facts as submitted

Factual background

The facts as submitted

The facts

Factual information

Chapter 15 Recent developments

1.2 A similar communication, based on the same facts, was submitted on 7 September 1998 by Mr. A.T.M.M., also claiming to be a victim of a violation by the Netherlands of article 17 of the Covenant.

The facts as presented

The facts as presented by the petitioner

The facts as presented

The facts as presented by the complainant

The facts as submitted by the complainant

The facts as presented

The facts as submitted by the complainants

The facts as presented

The facts as submitted by the author

The facts as submitted by the author

The facts as presented by the author

The facts as submitted

Facts as submitted by the author

The general background submitted by the authors

The facts as presented

The facts as presented

The facts as submitted by the authors

Or just facts, for starters.

The facts as presented

(a) Appeals on the merits

The facts have shown the opposite to be true.

The facts as submitted by Mr. Richard Jansen and his daughter Maria

The Court will now state the conclusions it draws from the facts as above set out.

But the facts on the ground tell a more ambiguous story.

(iii) Booklets, fact sheets, wall charts, information kits

(iii) Booklets, fact sheets, wallcharts, information kits

Consequently, the facts did not disclose a violation of the Convention. In the case of Quereshi v.

She alleges that the State party has not contested these facts.

Substantive issues Assessment of the facts and evidence by the domestic courts

Consideration of the content, promulgation, and adoption of codes of conduct for scientists

1. A State instituting a proceeding before a court of another State cannot invoke immunity from the jurisdiction of the court in respect of any counterclaim arising out of the same legal relationship or facts as the principal claim.

(f) The facts that are the subject of the communication occurred prior to the entry into force of the present Protocol for the State Party concerned unless those facts continued after that date.