The Myth of Green Energy Security

Current green energy policies are failing for a simple reason renewables are far too expensive.

They actively promote carbon intensive energy and deter green investment.

And just as these groups embrace the green energy challenge and it's really been amazing to me to watch how much brain power, how much money and how much serious thought has, really over the last three years, just poured into the green energy field.

The nuclear energy industry s decline began decades ago.

Making green energy cheap and prevalent will also take a long time.

Because of rising energy prices from green subsidies, 800,000 German households can no longer pay their electricity bills.

This is the amount that proud green energy producers will showcase when switching to biomass.

Dr. Mojtaba Khederzadeh Iran's top researcher in power industry (2005).

When green renewables are cheaper than fossil fuels, they will take over the world.

That requires a substantial increase in research and development into next generation green energy alternatives.

Policymakers must prioritize investment in green energy research and development.

Reading further, the leaflet gushes that France has created 90,000 jobs in the green economy.

Across Europe, calls for affordable energy are fast becoming a euphemism for increased fossil fuel subsidies and a rollback of commitments on green energy.

France likes to showcase its nuclear power industry, which supplies 78 of the country s electricity.

The problem is that green energy mostly is still much more expensive, less effective, and more intermittent than the alternatives.

Even with a major R D effort, green energy won t become affordable overnight.

Fracking is not a panacea, but it really is by far this decade s best green energy option.

Denmark itself has also already tried being a green energy innovator it led the world in embracing wind power. The results are hardly inspiring.

In the IEA s optimistic scenario, which assumes that the world s governments will fulfill all of their green promises, wind will provide 1.34 of global energy by 2035, while solar will provide 0.42 .

Here, too, Gülen concludes that the assertions are not backed up by any evidence and are inconsistent with the realities of green technologies and energy markets.

The fundamental problem is that green energy technologies are still very inefficient and expensive compared to fossil fuels.

Yet, the summit literature claims that it will boost economic growth and eradicate poverty.

Even firms in established industries such as energy report facing great difficulties in raising capital.

The changeover to a sustainable energy system will not come quickly, and will require new kinds of electrical power plants, new kinds of automobiles, and green buildings, which economize on energy use.

But the self interest of energy companies, biofuel producers, insurance firms, lobbyists, and others in supporting green policies is a point that is often missed.

We will need improved energy efficiency, through green buildings and more efficient appliances.

Instead, our upsized research will make green energy cheaper than fossil fuels by mid century.

Instead of focusing on climate change, the Climate Commission hyped the benefits that Denmark would experience if it led the shift to green energy.

Proponents of carbon cuts argue that green energy technologies only seem more expensive, because the price of fossil fuels does not reflect the cost of their impact on the climate.

According to The Wall Street Journal, the US Department of Energy (DOE) alone is planning to spend more than 40 billion in loans and grants to encourage private firms to develop green technologies, such as electric cars, new batteries, wind turbines, and solar panels.

This generates the heat in nuclear power reactors, and produces the fissile material for nuclear weapons.

The Green Paradox

Over the past decade, the nuclear industry has attempted to capture global leaders attention with a promotional campaign centered around the notion of a nuclear renaissance.

Both China and India can learn a lot from Japan, and both governments, fortunately, are firmly committed to increasing their energy efficiency and use of green technology.

In April 2005, experts from Brazil, China and India discussed a proposal to establish an energy service company industry in order to lower substantially economic, social and environmental costs in the energy field.

But carmakers think fuel cells are the better, more efficient, silent, clean power source for transportation.

After Japan s nuclear disaster at Fukushima, Germany decided to shut down its entire nuclear power industry and shift entirely to a strategy based on greater energy efficiency (lower energy input per unit of national income) and renewables.

China s Green Debt

No to Green Fundamentalism

The End of Green Ideology

The Green Inquisition

The Green Pseudo Revolution

The green shoots of a Green Economy are emerging across the power sector, driven by concerns about climate change, air pollution, and energy security as well as by the desire to generate new kinds of competitive, employment growing industries.

Today, Spain has some of Europe s best infrastructure, including high speed trains, high tech airports, fast highways, and top notch green energy networks.