Therefore, it is suggested that the relevant wording in UN Model article 26 be as follows

The emphasis will be on finding and retaining the services of suitably qualified professional staff and changing the structure of the Section.

In article 148, which deals with the crimes of kidnapping and false imprisonment, section I, was changed to include the companion in the list of possible victims of these crimes.

These are the squamous part, the orbital part, and the nasal part.

Prepared, justified and implemented the Section budget to achieve the Section's goals at the least cost.

Solemn declaration

Medical Section

United Nations Military Observers

of the Secretary General

(148 posts)

Section

This is real, tangible change, real, tangible change.

The section chief altered the plan.

Sami was the class clown.

Sami was in class.

The teacher walked into the class.

Sami went to class.

Revision of the agenda 22

Section 2 Final provisions

Evaluated Section staff's performance.

Elections 11 15.

Issue of communiqués concerning private meetings 36

The Section's work plan and objective setting matrix for 2004 were consistent with the terms of reference of the section.

Because the part of the brain that controls decision making doesn't control language.

Is there not an evidence in this for those who have sense ?

Why is there an oath in this , for the intelligent ?

Is there in that an oath for a mindful man ?

Indeed in that there is an oath for a man of sense .

There is indeed in them ( the above oaths ) sufficient proofs for men of understanding ( and that , they should avoid all kinds of sins and disbeliefs , etc . ) !

Is there in this an oath for a rational person ?

Is there in this an oath for one endowed with understanding ?

There surely is an oath for thinking man .

Is there an oath in that for one possessing intellect ?

Is there in that an oath for the mindful ?

Is there not in all that an oath sufficient for one of perception ?

Is this not a sufficient oath for intelligent people ?

Truly in that there is an oath for those who possess understanding .

is there not in this strong evidence for a man of sense ?

Is there ( not ) in these an adjuration ( or evidence ) for those who understand ?

Do you want to take off the other part of it?

The teacher went around the class.

the oath which he spoke to Abraham, our father,

The oath which he sware to our father Abraham,

Engineering Section (22 new posts)

And this surely is great evidence if you can understand