Subsequently, two telephone interviews were conducted with the claimant.

The award for this category A claim should be reduced to the amount appropriate to the proper status of the claim.

Iraq alleged that the claimant did not object to the confiscation of his stock by Iraqi authorities and that the claimant may have been a collaborator with Iraqi forces.

They alleged that on 1 January 1990 six partners, including the Palestinian claimant, the Jordanian claimant and the Kuwaiti claimant's husband, entered into a new partnership agreement with four additional partners to expand the lighting partnership.

Sixth claim unit Claim preparation costs Iran seeks compensation in the amount of USD 4,500,000 for administrative, technical and legal expenses of the preparation of this claim.

The fifth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

Fifth claim unit Claim preparation costs Iran seeks compensation in the amount of USD 51,075 for project implementation costs.

Third claim unit Claim preparation costs Jordan seeks compensation in the amount of USD 1,700,000 for claim preparation costs for its fourth and fifth F4 instalment claims, including its public health claim.

Second claim unit Claim preparation costs Saudi Arabia seeks compensation in the amount of USD 5,874 for claim preparation costs.

At the request of Saudi Arabia, the secretariat incorporated that claim in the current claim (Claim No. 5000463).

Where the third party was unable to verify the documents proffered by the claimant or provided statements inconsistent with the information provided by the claimant, the Panel finds the evidence submitted by the claimant to be unreliable.

The sixth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The third claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The Panel reviewed the overlapping claims together to determine which of the losses claimed by the category C claimant should be consolidated with the E4 claim for review.

Some of these identifiers are included in the claim form submitted by the claimant the remaining data is taken from the evidence provided by a claimant either in the original claim or in response to claim development notifications.

The first claim unit is for reduction in crop yields and the second claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

Third claim unit Project with FAO UNDP Iran seeks compensation in the amount of USD 10,000,000 for losses incurred by IFC following a delay in the implementation of a joint fisheries project with FAO and UNDP.

Summary of recommended awards for the claims of Iran 58

The claimant states that the business operated pursuant to a rent a permit agreement with the Kuwaiti licence holder.

The deferred part of claim No. 5000379 has been included in claim No. 5000301.

The Panel considers that this claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

Overlapping claim

UNCC claim No. 3011623.

UNCC claim No. 1810440.

The seventh claim file was not transmitted to Iraq as the claimant objected to such transmission.

In a number of cases the Panel found that the claimant in this instalment is not the owner of the subject business and therefore the issue of potential competition with a previously paid claim is resolved.

In November 2005, State schools remained closed, as teachers continued to demand payment of salary arrears.

The claimant was interviewed during the technical mission to Jordan in January 2005.

Both the Kuwaiti claimant and the Palestinian claimant were interviewed during the technical mission to Kuwait in 2004 and each claimant was asked to comment on the assertions and evidence submitted by the other.

UNCC claim No. 3012161

UNCC claim No. 3011290

UNCC claim No. 3011328

UNCC claim No. 3010941

UNCC claim No. 3011574

UNCC claim No. 3011731

UNCC claim No. 3012801

UNCC claim No. 3010785

UNCC claim No. 3012091

UNCC claim No. 3010883

UNCC claim No. 3012104

UNCC claim No. 3011345

For example, in UNCC claim No. 3012105, the claimant did not include audited accounts in his original claim submission.

This claim was originally part of category F3 claim No. 5000194.

After a stormy meeting with de Gaulle at the Élysée Palace, Massu telephoned his chief of staff, Colonel Antoine Argoud, who had been pressing for a coup.

Both the Kuwaiti claimant and the Palestinian claimant were interviewed during the December 2004 technical mission to Kuwait and each claimant was asked to comment on the assertions and evidence submitted by the other.