Risk factors

But it was either risk getting killed by a gun or risk dying of hunger.

But it is a worthwhile risk.

So I decided to take a risk and go to Europe.

This appears to be a low risk activity.

Hard work never killed anyone. But why take the risk?!

This approach implies that more can be done to reduce systemic risk, beyond reforming how risk is measured and capital buffers determined.

The connection between financial risk and asset price swings emerges from the use of a new approach Imperfect Knowledge Economics (IKE) to understanding risk and fluctuations in asset markets.

To repeat well known, worn out positions may give us a sense of comfort. Why not stay on the safe side?

Well, their answer was, It's all about risk and reward.

India has no desire to jeopardize any of this.

This sharing of information will reduce risk somewhat.

I know that any change or innovation means risks could be involved.

The risk element was therefore a prerequisite for application of the draft optional protocol.

It is supported by risk factors that contribute to increased vulnerability.

Risking their lives seemed a better option to them than staying home.

Secondly, any widening of the scope of application should clearly reflect the element of risk.

Selfies can be memorable and surprising without risking your life.

Tom deserves a promotion.

It was worth a try.

The payoff will be worth it.

Who is to Blame?

Who Should Be Bailed Out?

Forget it. It's not worth it.

But on the other hand, I hear people talking about fear, a sense of risk aversion.

That was the same risk strategy that preceded the financial crisis in 2008.

The Third Wave experiment is an example of risk behavior in authoritarian peer pressure situations.

And staying on the safe side definitely means missing out on the opportunities that might just offer progress to all.

Tom certainly deserves praise.

It was well worth the trouble.

He's not worth your trouble.

That is to be welcomed.

Every effort deserves a reward.

Every effort deserves a reward.

But this increases systemic risk, rather than reducing it.

Given this risk, Kyong hui s poor health is a significant hindrance.

One option would be to take no action because there is no experience to assess the degree of risk.

The more secure the borrowing, the more likely the investor is to get its loan repaid and the less risk is involved in making the loan.

This creates a risk that poverty reduction strategies aimed at these peoples will fail.

Nothing to write home about, but a lot to write about.

What the lawyers tweet about doesn't warrant monitoring.

Not every question deserves an answer.

It seemed worth trying. It wasn t.

But it is worth maintaining some perspective.

The issue of the environment deserves increased attention.