This algorithm quantifies risk.

Such risks demand examination and planning.

This strategy is not without risks.

But this view is not without its own risks.

Manufactured risks are marked by a high level of human agency involved in both producing, and mitigating such risks.

Even democratic bodies are not immune to this danger.

European leaders need to address these dangers.

Other ways might be available to control reduce such risks.

But for this to be tolerable, the US needs to relieve China of existing risks.

The additional resources described above will be necessary to minimize such risks.

The risks include health risks from overcrowding and poor sanitation, increased vulnerability to natural disasters and risks of eviction and economic vulnerability because of the lack of secure employment.

Only a small fraction of the risks arising from globalization require a truly global response. But, by definition, these risks transcend the nation state thus, coordinated action is required to address them effectively.

In a general way, information provided by these parties on these hazards are synthesised and presented together, while the risk assessments, specific to the conditions prevailing in these countries, are presented separately.

Yet there are several significant risks to global economic stability and prosperity that must be addressed urgently.

These risks directly affect the sustainability of this nation and its continuity.

Commodity bonds may offer a neat way to circumvent these risks.

The first concerns the temptation to follow China s lead unquestioningly.

The political stakes are high, and the outcome is likely to reflect that.

The rhetoric may sound extreme, but with so much hanging in the balance, surely it s justified.

The hazards of pools for spent nuclear fuel have been known for many years, but little action has been taken to alleviate the risks.

That guarantee has insured investors against their biggest risk.

This was a high risk strategy without a safety net.

These studies are occasionally reviewed by some scientific committees to assess overall risks.

It is against this background that the risks inherent in different kinds of reform should be assessed.

These observers proved right the crisis was marked by soaring risk premia.

It gives us hope that US President Barack Obama recognizes these dangers.

We must act to contain such dangers by strengthening the United Nations so that it can perform its functions.

This all hazards philosophy should permeate thinking on the development of a global warning system.

These efforts must be maintained, to eliminate potential threats to the approaching electoral process.

These hot spots require attention in preventing leakages and monitoring the usage of public resources.

In recent years, much attention has been paid to the role of the board in risk assessment or management and internal controls designed to mitigate risk.

This seems to be one of those cases the risks are great, and outweigh whatever benefits violent video games may have.

But like DIYbio, the positive outcomes and the potential for good for a study like that far outweighs the risk.

These four risks are material and consequential, and each is growing in importance.

So they consult lawyers and IT risk specialists to consider their options.

The strategies that include measures to prevent and mitigate the impact of risks are the most effective.

My message remains that the advantages of starting work on these issues far outweigh the risks.

The report estimates that a 10 reduction in the productive capacity of soils and freshwater areas alone could lead to a reduction in the trade balance equivalent to more than 4 of GDP.

Issues to be addressed relating to this option include how to quantify the risk factors of climate change and take them into account in decision making how to consider, in addition to property losses, the more important issue of human losses in developing and developed countries and how to promote strategic partnerships with professional organizations in this field.

While the chance of a perfect storm with all of these risks materializing in their most virulent form is low, any one of them alone would be enough to stall the global economy and tip it into recession.

The hope is that such reforms will reduce the likelihood and severity of systemic risk.

Well, it has not worked so far, and the already sizeable stakes just got bigger.

These risks will not disappear while NATO members focus on fixing their finances.

Indeed, investors increasingly want to hedge against such risks early on.

Indeed, such guarantees constitute the most significant medium and long term financial risks to China.