We agree.

We must agree on the Secretary General's counter terrorism strategy.

We agreed to it only because we believe in the ideals for which the Organization stands.

On the whole, we agree with the mandate of the Working Party as set forth in the report.

We also agree with the commendation of the Court's work during the period under review.

We have stated that we are favourably disposed to the establishment of a Peacebuilding Commission to assume post conflict responsibilities.

As we all agree, the time has come for important and substantial progress in determining Kosovo's political status.

We also agree that the Council's working methods should be modernized to make them more transparent, more inclusive and more responsive.

We agree to eliminate references to enemy States in Articles 53, 77 and 107 of the Charter.

For a developing country such as ours, we agree that the primary responsibility for socio economic development in our country rests with us.

We therefore cannot agree that the conclusion of a violation of the Covenant can be sustained in the present case.

To that end, we should all agree to more resources being allocated in an institutionalized manner through assessed contributions.

We continue to agree with the Agency's assessment that global socio economic development needs will require a large increase in the supply of energy in the coming decades.

Likewise, we agree that the Tribunals can achieve their tasks only if the necessary resources are made available.

However, in order to reach agreement on a programme of work, we accept the mandate contained in the five Ambassadors' proposal.

In addition, we do not agree with the dissenting views of Mr. Scheinin, Ms. Chanet, and Mr. Lallah in this case.

The formal tabling of our draft proposal should not be construed as our concurrence with a vote on the crucial issue of Security Council reform.

We agree with the humanitarian objectives of the Ottawa Convention and, in principle, we do not reject the idea of acceding to it within a reasonable time frame.

We also agree that, even if it would be preferable for action to be taken by consensus, that must not become an excuse for postponing action.

Panama has supported the High level Meeting's draft outcome document (A 60 L.1), not because it is in full agreement with it but because it understands that the document is the beginning of a process of reform.

The United States will not support the adoption of this section because we do not agree with the allocation of the item on the International Criminal Court (ICC) directly to the plenary.

It is important that all understand that while we disagree with this resolution, the nations that have put it forward are our friends.

As usual I don't know if this is a good custom or not the first step we are invited to take is that we agree on an agenda.

While we endorse the importance of ensuring that those global targets are reached, we also strongly believe that we need to focus on the sustainability of the MDGs beyond 2015.

We generally agree that the future status of Kosovo and Metohija can influence regional stability and trade, but a one sided solution to the problem of Kosovo and Metohija would be a very poor compromise.

Because of our concerns, we do not agree to a Security Council referral of the situation in Darfur to the ICC and abstained in the voting on today's resolution.

Given the vicissitudes of the modern world, it would be great folly to accord special permanent status to a handful of States, because whatever decision is made now will inevitably be out of synch with changing realities in decades to come.

Although we continue to regard the inter agency consolidated appeals process as the main mechanism for mobilizing financial resources, we agree that these goals can be achieved through a reorganization of the Central Emergency Revolving Fund, by adding a grant component.

We therefore approve the flow chart for monitoring and reporting on children and armed conflict, but we feel that its relevance will depend on the effective commitment of the various actors, their respective mandates and their resolve to take the measures appropriate to each situation.

We also agree that, in order to ensure human dignity, we must be ready to embrace the responsibility to protect and to provide the judicial mechanisms particularly the International Criminal Court and other regional courts with international mandates to punish those who offend against human dignity.

In this regard, we agree to continue our work towards enhancing the coordination of our technical assistance programmes in transit transport in order to maximize the benefits derived for landlocked and transit developing countries.

Considering that the Trusteeship Council no longer meets and that its remaining functions are carried out by other bodies of the United Nations, in particular the General Assembly, we agree to delete Chapter XIII of the Charter and references to the Council in Chapter XII.

If all member States of the CD would sincerely transform into reality their often stated political interest in genuine effective multilateralism in the area of disarmament and arms control, we could and would agree on a work programme for the Conference on Disarmament.

And when somebody gets up, in fact, to go answer a phone or use a bathroom or something, the empty seat becomes, if you will, that person. And you point frequently to the empty seat and you say, He or she wouldn't agree, and the empty chair is that person and the spatiality is crucial.

The case was adjourned and we gathered outside the court to wait for the verdict. Meanwhile, a few journalists spoke to us trying to know whether we agreed with what Kareem had written or not. I tried to explain to them that despite our disagreement with Kareem, we are here because we believe in freedom of expression and that arrest and punishment in this manner won't change a thing, she added.