Whether it has gored a son or has gored a daughter, according to this judgment it shall be done to him.

Whether he have gored a son, or have gored a daughter, according to this judgment shall it be done unto him.

If the bull gores a male servant or a female servant, thirty shekels of silver shall be given to their master, and the ox shall be stoned.

If the ox shall push a manservant or a maidservant he shall give unto their master thirty shekels of silver, and the ox shall be stoned.

If one man's bull injures another's, so that it dies, then they shall sell the live bull, and divide its price and they shall also divide the dead animal.

And if one man's ox hurt another's, that he die then they shall sell the live ox, and divide the money of it and the dead ox also they shall divide.

If a bull gores a man or a woman to death, the bull shall surely be stoned, and its flesh shall not be eaten but the owner of the bull shall not be held responsible.

If an ox gore a man or a woman, that they die then the ox shall be surely stoned, and his flesh shall not be eaten but the owner of the ox shall be quit.

But instead of finishing his career in triumph, or at least with an ovation, he was ejected from the final for head butting an Italian player.

For I came to set a man at odds against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter in law against her mother in law.

For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.

Denmark) and No. 33 2003 (Quereshi v. Denmark (No. 2)).

Republic of Guyana, 867 1999, Smartt v. Republic of Guyana, 917 2000, Arutyunyan v. Uzbekistan, 927 2000, Svetik v. Belarus, 1006 2001, Martínez Muñoz v. Spain 1084 2002, Bochaton v. France, 1138 2002, Arenz v. Germany and 1167 2003, Ramil Rayos v. The Philippines.

And as long as we fight horizontally, against life, against the winds, against what's happening to us, life is a nightmare.

Against war and those against War.

The Netherlands and Habassi v. Denmark, op. cit.

566 1993 (Ivan Somers v. Hungary).

Switzerland), 226 2003 (Tharina Ali v.

Serbia and Montenegro), 194 2001 (I.S.D. v. France), 195 2002 (Mafhoud Brada v. France), 212 2002 (Kepa Urra Guridi v.

Against Simplification

Going Against Conventional Wisdom

The War on Democratization

Australia).

Switzerland).

Austria).

Their vote for Hollande was a vote against Sarkozy, not against austerity.

The following judgements were based on guilty pleas Prosecutor v. Jean Kambanda (1998) Prosecutor v. Omar Serushago (1999) Prosecutor v. Georges Ruggiu (2000) Prosecutor v.Vincent Rutaganira (2005).

Jean Kambanda (1998) Prosecutor v. Omar Serushago (1999) Prosecutor v. Georges Ruggiu (2000) Prosecutor v.Vincent Rutaganira (2005).

The war against separatism in the North Caucasus has now evolved into the war against Islamic fundamentalism.

Our protest is NOT against the World Cup, but against the delayed construction works and the lack of care towards the population!

case and the Military II case are also complex trials.

Because if you think about it, normally when we think of conflict, when we describe it, there's always two sides it's Arabs versus Israelis, labor versus management, husband versus wife, Republicans versus Democrats.

The Chamber carried out pre trial activities in the cases of The Prosecutor v. Nzabirinda, The Prosecutor v. Nsengimana and The Prosecutor v. Rugambarara.

Beijing Versus the Billionaire

Economists vs. Economics

History versus Europe

Declamation against reclamation

as a treatment against consumption.

Waking up is the opposite of going to sleep.

Violence against children

A War on Tolerance

Germany versus the Euro

Insuring Against Insurance

Recession Insurance

Romney versus Obama