These figures are only the early warnings of an emerging trend.

The numbers seem to bear that out.

Those figures may change in due course.

These figures are limited only to those who attend antenatal care and the figure is likely to be much higher if figures for those who visit private practitioners are included.

These figures have fallen dramatically over the past several decades.

The moral of this story is that numbers do not tell us everything.

Still, even these scaled down figures represent huge amounts of money.

And from all of these numbers, I start with only two or three variables.

It would be nice to understand those numbers better.

These numbers may be perplexing, but they are useful to understand.

But these aggregate figures obscure differences among countries and regions.

The comparatives reported in this document have not been re stated.

However, these figures do not represent the number of computer users.

Again, these are only estimates.

The new numbers set off a firestorm of debate, and have brought conspiracy theorists out in force.

But that savings number hides something very critical.

But these numbers result from flawed methodology, making the situation appear far worse than it is.

Note These figures were extrapolated from April 2005 statistics.

These startling figures do not include economic crimes outside the public sector.

These figures are a good deal weaker than originally stated.

Those figures would be communicated to the Committee at a later date.

a Figures will be increased upon the confirmation of current funding proposals.

Thus, the figures should be treated as provisional, since they are subject to change as more responses are received.

A lot of memory contest champions claim to use this technique to recall faces, digits, and lists of words.

But these numbers are woefully inadequate relative to the magnitude of the problem.

Given these staggering sums, the US could face a double dip, W shaped recession.

c These figures could increase considerably as a result of the institution of new proceedings.

a Figures may be increased upon the confirmation of current funding proposals.

If you think those numbers are not quite comparable, you are right that is part of the problem.

Despite some attempts to consolidate these lists, there continues to be a serious problem of over counting.

Helping people to think clearly about these numbers is important.

These figures provide some useful insights into the evolving social fabric of Arab societies.

But these figures are changing rapidly, owing to China s exuberant growth.

No sound monetarist thinks those numbers predict current inflation.

Did they invent the numbers? asks Sophie Verney Caillat on Rue89.com .

In 2000 these figures were 69 , 20 and 11 respectively.

These figures are expected to remain virtually unchanged during 2003 2005.

Those figures had remained fairly stable since the economy had taken off in 1999.

These figures indicate just how unstable the country s political situation had become.

Why are those numbers so finely tuned to allow stars to shine and planets to form, when we recognize that if you fiddle with those numbers if I had 20 dials up here and I let you come up and fiddle with those numbers, almost any fiddling makes the universe disappear.

These staggering numbers present an awesome responsibility for our citizens and our governments alike.

The numbers have forced Obama and Merkel to reconcile their projections with reality.

b Figures based on ENS89 and the 2002 census.

These total figures also reflect new influxes as well as repatriations.

These figures were calculated by economists Chris Green and Isabel Galiana of McGill University.