The United States is emphasizing higher capital requirements.

This capital has to be invested somewhere.

Counter cyclical capital requirements fit with this idea, and a range of indicators could be used to calibrate the increase in capital requirements, coupled perhaps with some discretion.

And equity capital requirements for large, systemically important financial institutions remain too low.

There have been some increases in capital requirements but far short of what is needed.

Similarly, banks would have incentives to game capital adequacy requirements by manipulating how capital and assets are defined.

Smarter capital requirements better Basel rules aren t the answer.

The best known tools for this are margin requirements and minimum capital requirements.

There seems to be little appetite for proposals to vary capital adequacy requirements counter cyclically.

At the source, capital requirements for currency mismatches in portfolios, together with margin requirements on foreign exchange derivatives, make sense.

Moreover, economists have argued that universalism is an investment in human capital that aids the development of a nation as a whole.

In the Basel III negotiations that concluded last year, the French and Germans strongly favored relatively low capital requirements.

All this financial engineering would avoid the obsolete capital requirements that burden banks operation.

The banks claim that higher capital requirements and other regulations will drive up the cost of credit.

Initial capital

Some will be reinvested and used to boost the company s capital stock.

High capital and provision requirements for certain transactions, or prohibition of such transactions, should also be introduced for prudential reasons.

It is not businesslike. It makes it very difficult to earn money.

The Art of Capital Flight

Damming Capital

The Capital Flow Conundrum

Capital flows and remittances

E. Financial capital and resilience

National Capital

Capital purchase items.

liabilities plus equity.

Who is HlG Capital?

The height kind of represents the quantity.

Er... Thee capitalization will be shared equally.

No working capital requirements have been included in this budget submission to leave room for other priority expenditure requirements.

Well, make the most of it. I do not wish to linger on this Cape Verde ground.

There seems to be little appetite for proposals to vary capital adequacy requirements counter cyclically. This would enable capital buffers to be created in good years, which could then be drawn down in bad years.

As above, firm value is enhanced when, and if, the return on capital exceeds the cost of capital.

For instance, we know that the global capital adequacy requirements produced by the Basel Committee reflect overwhelmingly the influence of large banks.

This put financial capital in a privileged position governments had to pay more attention to the requirements of international capital than to the aspirations of their own people.

But, when it comes to upping equity requirements against risk weighted assets, who is to do the weighting, and according to what methodology?

The portion of capital inflows that is not re exported represents net capital inflows.

So what is going to happen is the guy with the capital is just going to end up with more capital.

The Siren Song of Capital Controls

Investment and private flows

(o) Working Capital Fund

I. ROLE OF FOREIGN CAPITAL

II. ROLE OF FOREIGN CAPITAL . 2 4 2

Net movement of capital e

(b) Working capital funds