Belarus

Mexico s War of Choice

North Korea s Choice

Sheena Iyengar on the art of choosing

Women have the right to choose.

We have a choice.

So choices have to be made.

Empowerment is the freedom to choose.

The Permanent Bureau appreciates the sophisticated mechanism of general opt out (article 19 (2) at the end), opt out for specific conventions (article 19 (4)) and, following a general opt out, a re opt in for specific conventions (article 19 (3)).

The Mixed Blessing of Genetic Choice

The choice today is clear.

The choice is especially important now, when poverty in the Third World is finally being recognized as our greatest problem and challenge.

Each radio button is normally accompanied by a label describing the choice that the radio button represents.

When the choice alighted on Barack Obama three years ago, the Norwegian Nobel Committee was criticized for honoring someone whose achievements were still to come.

The choice appalls voters.

From War of Choice to War Without End

The choices to be made are not simple, obvious, or clear cut.

Contractual choice of application of the draft instrument

For being not yet born, neither having done anything good or bad, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him who calls,

(For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth )

In fact, though all humans share a basic need and desire for choice, we don't all see choice in the same places or to the same extent.

Choice is the essence of governance, and to abstain from it for whatever reason is to shirk responsibility.

The choice will depend on the characteristics of the country.

Today, that choice must be made anew.

From this hard choice arises another dilemma.

It is up to Ukrainians to decide this for themselves and thus to overcome post revolutionary disillusion.

The trouble is that Germany has not been forced to choose.

There is always a choice, and there are always consequences.

Choice is everything.

And I strongly believe that this is the choice that should have never emerged.

But simply choosing between expansion and austerity is not the whole story.

It will address adverse selection by including an individual mandate.

But even this comparison involves a selection bias.

This would force people to exercise choice.

And I have decided to go for the second option, although it is not easy.

Following a review, the organizing team selected 15 people to take part.

Others wondered how such a selection was made in the first place

This second option, however, would have a serious limitation.

This is subject to the provision of transparent and verifiable information that the choice will not increase the expected net anthropogenic greenhouse gas removals by sinks.

It will not serve our larger purpose if we are left divided after choosing among resolutions that favour a few, leaving fissures and factions as we pick winners and losers once and for all.

As the elite vacillated between emancipation and loyalty to the Spanish Monarchy, independence was achieved only after the occupation by military campaigns of José de San Martín and Simón Bolívar.

Of course, such a choice carries risks. Do we know the people we would be helping?

Here, too, reality does not seem to have endorsed Free to Choose.

Europe, however, is not obliged to choose between catastrophe and mutualization of debt.

Europe does not face a choice between soft and hard power.