Scenario I varying the weights of existing factors within the current base figure

Under the first scenario, Uribe faces the danger of being pushed into a weak or unconditional peace process.

In the first scenario, the two countries senior delegations remain deadlocked, with their polarized stances frozen in place.

No one can tell when the first will happen and no governments are prepared to do the second.

This is the rosy scenario.

That is the scenario at the moment.

The first scenario is when a real war threatens to spill over into a wider conflict, destabilizing the region and Great Power relations.

But this scenario failed to materialize.

And this is just the baseline scenario.

The 450 scenario presents an immense challenge.

There are concrete examples of this scenario.

And we've got the mathematics to describe this process.

The last scenario came from William himself.

The first scenario is a continuation of the current situation. Russia and the EU would continue trying to consolidate their positions by competing for influence over their mutual neighbors.

In the first scenario, a more united and homogeneous Europe emerges from the crisis, enforcing greater restrictions on member states budgets to reduce apparent risk.

The main glitch in this scenario, however, is Lewites.

Another negative scenario is military rule.

Thus, Egypt is reenacting the Algerian scenario.

The other school of thought does not take this scenario lightly.

CAMBRIDGE Consider the following scenario.

But Syria s fragmentation is not the only plausible scenario.

This scenario would grant the US three enormous advantages.

At first sight, the reasons to dismiss this scenario seem overwhelming.

But this scenario does not correspond to reality.

But there are downside and upside risks to this scenario.

But victory for the forces of jihad is not the only possible scenario.

But this is implausible.

But a Japanese style scenario seems inevitable after 2015.

That scenario now looks all the more likely.

A war ends. An international donors conference is called.

Such a scenario can be summarized as follows.

The second scenario is more dangerous for the entire world.

This is the scenario these young Homsis show through their lenses

Unfortunately, that scenario now seems to be unfolding.

Under this scenario, we could be witnessing an energy crisis in the making.

The current crisis killed off this optimistic scenario.

Such a scenario could amount to fighting to the last Syrian child.

Of course, one can only hope that such a scenario remains pure conjecture.

Screenwriter Brian Helgeland was hired to develop a new script.

Under the second scenario, all of the resources would be allocated to additional social policies.

Think Japan, and its corporate zombies of the 1990 s. Just as they wrote the script for the first of Japan s lost decades, their counterparts are now doing the same for the US economy.

And then we gave them options that were bonuses like you guys did in the first scenario so they actually have a chance more, or pieces where they were experiencing losses they actually thought they were going to get more than they really got.

In the second scenario, Russia and the EU would pool their efforts and collaborate.

Judging from their recent statements, the scenario that they are concocting is simple.

While that scenario is simple, reality is not.