(f) The question of the use of the veto.

The question of the use of the veto

(a) Restraint on the use of the veto

Limiting the Security Council Veto

My third point relates to the use of the veto.

Let me briefly deal with the matter of the veto.

In fact, Africa's position on the veto, which my delegation wholeheartedly supports, is that it should be abolished.

The third message is the claim to the veto power.

Our support is without prejudice to our historical position on the veto.

In our view, the veto can rarely be justified.

Moreover, we must do away with the right of the veto.

In line with the need for effective decision making, it is our preference to limit the use of the veto in general, and we certainly oppose extension of the veto to new permanent members.

First, Switzerland is opposed to granting the right of veto to new permanent members.

There should be no extension of the right of veto, and the use of the veto should be limited.

But our critics say that the AU is not really committed to the veto at all that it does not really want the veto, but something entirely different.

Another provision gave the government a veto power over most church activities.

The use of the veto power should be limited and eventually eliminated.

We have also consistently advocated limiting the use of the veto.

It establishes that the veto will not be exercised by the new permanent members.

Other delegations stated that the elimination of the veto was not a realistic proposition.

We therefore believe that the veto power should not be extended to new members.

Instead, a veto free culture should be promoted.

The proposed language concerning the veto power has already found broad acceptance.

We have often reaffirmed that the veto should be eliminated.

We shall also have to look into the issue of the veto once again.

The Basic Law also provides the Bundesrat with an absolute veto of such legislation.

Allow me now to clarify Africa's position with regard to the thorny issue of the veto.

Some participants urged ending permanent membership and restricting or ending the veto.

We believe that the question of limiting the right of veto should be reconsidered in the coming months.

According to those critics, permanent members with the veto, permanent members without the veto and non permanent members would constitute three unmanageable and in fact unequal tiers, but the continued dominance of the permanent five and the proposed 20 non permanent members would form one happy, equal family.

Therefore, until the ultimate objective of eliminating the veto can be achieved, it is necessary, as a first step in that direction, to limit the veto's use to actions taken under Chapter VII of the Charter.

The powers of the Seanad are in effect limited to delay rather than veto.

Nonetheless, this does not preclude an independent royal decision to exercise a right of veto.

First, we fully support the recommendation of the Secretary General not to expand the veto power.

First, the two permanent seats to be allocated to Africa must include the right of the veto.

Neither the concept of permanent membership nor the veto has been a useful tool for ensuring international peace and security.

It was also suggested that if a veto is used, an explanation of the reasons for the veto should be given to the Assembly.

Among other things, that draft resolves to enlarge the Security Council in both the permanent and non permanent categories of membership and to improve its working methods. It also resolves to accord new permanent members the same prerogatives and privileges as the current permanent members, including the right of the veto.

The Americans, who would have had to provide most of the money, vetoed the plan.

We also welcome the inclusion of a review process in the draft resolution and the shelving of the question of the veto.

We must also do away with the right of veto, which often paralyses the Council.

Chile supports the addition of new permanent members, but without the right of veto.

In fact, veto power should be given only to the General Assembly, to be exercised by a majority vote.

Too often, permanent members have used the veto real or threatened to prevent effective action.

We ask for at least two permanent members with a veto and five non permanent seats.