The person considered as the shipper will also have the opportunity to escape its liability if it proves that it is not the shipper by indicating who is really the shipper.

Another delegation favours a provision where the actual shipper will be liable if it agrees to be named as the shipper in the contract particulars.

Some delegations have also indicated that they would like to see an explicit provision regulating that the shipper and the actual shipper are jointly liable.

(a) Between the carrier and the shipper

Article 31 regulates the liability of the shipper.

However, one delegation has expressed the view that provided that the actual shipper is liable, the contractual shipper should be relieved of his liability.

A strict liability is considered to put too much burden on the shipper.

Freight forwarders may thus be both carrier (vis à vis the smaller shipper) and shipper (vis à vis a unimodal carrier, such as a sea carrier).

Vicarious liability of the shipper (draft article 35, former 32)

If the carrier is unable, after reasonable effort, to identify and find the controlling party or the shipper, then the person referred to in article 34 (previously 31) is deemed to be the shipper for purposes of this paragraph.

Material misstatement by the shipper (draft article 32, former 29 bis)

When they returned to their people they returned jesting

If the carrier is unable, after reasonable effort, to identify and find the controlling party or the shipper, then the person referred to in article 34 (previously 31) shall be deemed to be the shipper for purposes of this paragraph.

Scott returned to Hollywood and Graham Zelda returned to the hospital.

and when they returned to their people they returned blithely ,

And when they returned to their household they returned jesting .

And when they returned to their own folk , they returned jesting

And when they returned to their own followers they returned exulting .

If the shipper does not fulfill this obligation, it may be held liable.

One other delegation was of the view that it followed implicitly from the existing text in article 28 that unless otherwise agreed the shipper has an obligation to deliver the goods at the time and place indicated by the shipper.

The carrier must provide to the shipper, on its request and in a timely manner, such information as is within the carrier's knowledge and such instructions that are reasonably necessary or of importance to the shipper in order to comply with its obligations under article 28.

The shipper must try to find the right person to whom delivery should be made, or, if it fails in its efforts, the shipper may take the responsibility for a proper delivery itself by, for instance, requesting the carrier to store the goods on its behalf.

Further it was suggested that the notice to the third party should be required to be given by the shipper.

Sami returned to Egypt.

The messengers returned to him, and he said to them, Why is it that you have returned?

Carol returned to her hotel.

Life quickly returned to normal.

Sami returned home to Egypt.

Sami returned home to Egypt.

He never returned to Portugal.

One other delegation has proposed to delete reasonably in the chapeau in that the shipper would have to provide all necessary documents.

The shipper must provide to the carrier in a timely manner such information, instructions, and documents that are reasonably necessary for

The shipper is the controlling party unless it designates another party to be the controlling party and so notifies the carrier.

In 2005, more than 5,400 refugees returned to Rwanda, in addition to the almost 13,500 who returned in 2004.

It was noted that certain provisions pertaining to the obligations of the shipper, such as those pursuant to draft articles 25 and 27, and to the draft article 26 obligation of the carrier to provide information to the shipper upon request, were considered to have safety implications, and were thus open to consideration for similar treatment.

I returned his book to him.

I returned Tom's book to him.

Life returned to normal for Fadil.

Sami returned to his pizza joint.

In April, Orwell returned to Barcelona.

In 1864 he returned to Paris.

Ojeda returned to Spain in 1496.

He returned to Cambridge in 1910.

In 1974, Alatlı returned to Turkey.

Paragraph 1 of this Article does not affect the responsibilities, liabilities, rights or immunities of the shipper.