The view was expressed that the current conclusions and recommendations section should give overall direction to the Secretariat.

The view of one of these delegations is here that the word accepts is too vague compared to other alternative word receives .

He trusted that a broad consensus reflecting the considered opinion of the Commission could now be reached.

The view was expressed that parties should have complete freedom to conclude arbitration clauses and to rely on their application.

The view was expressed that actions of transnational companies could sometimes be an obstacle to sustainable development.

The view was also expressed that the question of validity was essential in the regime of reservations and constituted its basis in principle.

Views were expressed that logical frameworks for executive direction and management should be included in the next biennial programme plan.

The view was expressed that the periodic elections of members of the Security Council was an important means of enhancing accountability of the Council vis à vis the General Assembly.

Some delegations reiterated the view that the geostationary orbit was a scarce natural resource, which ran the risk of becoming saturated.

The view was expressed that a disaster management international space coordination organization should be established under the aegis of the United Nations system.

Views were also expressed that the formal discussions of the strategic framework should be scheduled in clusters corresponding to parts of the budget.

The view was also expressed that Article 31 of the Charter should be interpreted in such a manner as to allow non members to participate in informal consultations.

A similar view with regard to the relations between the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and KFOR was held by A. Pellet, L'imputabilité d'éventuels actes illicites.

The view was expressed that the final decision regarding the identity of the supervisory authority remained with the diplomatic conference that would be convened to adopt the future protocol.

Various speakers expressed the view that signatory States should make every effort to strengthen cooperation in accordance with chapter V of the Convention, pending its entry into force.

A similar view had been expressed in the statements of China (A C.6 59 SR.21, para. 43) and Belarus (A C.6 59 SR.22, para.

The contrary view was expressed, that exclusive jurisdiction clauses should never apply to third parties, since they were not parties to the contract.

Some delegations expressed the view that where no regional fisheries management organization exists, coastal States should have the right and duty to adopt conservation measures.

Some delegations expressed the view that in deciding on which activities to engage in UN Oceans should consider the views of member States.

The Syrian Arab Republic emphasized once again that distinction must be made between terrorism, which was a heinous crime, and the right to resist foreign occupation, which was enshrined in the Charter.

A smaller number of delegations expressed the strongly held view that the draft instrument should not allow parties to a contract of carriage to agree to exclusive jurisdiction clauses.

Several speakers expressed the view that developing countries needed to take greater responsibility for their own development, through continued efforts to improve governance at the national level.

The view was expressed that work being carried out on the use of NPS should not be restricted only to the use of NPS in deep space.

Some participants also viewed free, prior and informed consent as an evolutionary process that could lead to co management and decision making by indigenous peoples on programmes and projects affecting them.

Support was expressed for both approaches.

The view was expressed that the proposal to establish such a coordination entity was the first concrete action to be taken by the Scientific and Technical Subcommittee on the recommendation of UNISPACE III.

Many representatives expressed the view that the Bangkok Declaration was a crucial political document laying the foundation for and showing the direction in strengthening international coordination and cooperation efforts, in order to prevent and combat crime.

The view was expressed that the language of draft article 1 was unsatisfactory as it focused on measures that a State could take for the exercise of diplomatic protection without defining the basic elements.

The view was expressed that in the case of a general authorization of reservations, the other parties could always object to them, and that expressly authorized reservations were subject to the test of compatibility with the object and purpose of the treaty.

Some delegations expressed the view that the geostationary orbit was an integral part of outer space and that its use was governed by the provisions of the United Nations treaties on outer space.

The view was also expressed that use of the opt out provision by a host State could be perceived as an unfriendly act towards the organizations providing the assistance and be a disincentive to the staff assigned to the operation.

Others expressed misgivings.

The view was expressed that the Subcommittee should continue to use a wide range of mechanisms to assist in the implementation of the recommendations of UNISPACE III, including the consideration of a more integrated approach where appropriate.

The view was expressed that, whenever possible, alternative power sources should be used for space missions and the use of NPS should be restricted to a minimum of a few exceptions.

The view was expressed that open meetings should be convened, as appropriate, to afford non members of the Council the opportunity to attend informative briefings from the Secretariat and special envoys and representatives of the Secretary General.

Others were of the view that, given the scant practice in the area, it was not possible to assert that the regime of diplomatic protection of all legal persons should be the same as the regime applicable to corporations.

The view was expressed that the future protocol not only opened up possibilities of conflict with the outer space treaties but could also lead to the compromise of national interests.

The view was expressed that although proposals were made during the course of discussions regarding alternatives to the United Nations assuming the role of supervisory authority, those proposals were not the subject of a detailed analysis.

He intended to act accordingly.

Page 36, first column, top of page

Some delegations expressed the view that the term secretariat in subparagraphs (c) (iii) and (d) of the decision was used on the understanding that it included UNODC in its full programmatic and operational capacity.

The view was expressed that the flag State's ability to seek redress for non national crew members depended on the facts of each case, the nature of the complaint, the redress sought and the legal regime under which it was sought.

The view was expressed that progress made at the last session of the Unidroit committee of governmental experts indicated that the future protocol would not be incompatible with the legal regime applicable to outer space.

Some delegations expressed the view that the default provisions, which envisaged the transfer of space assets under the future protocol, could result in the erosion of rights and obligations under the outer space treaties.

Several delegations expressed the view that solutions to the problem of marine debris not only needed to be implemented within the marine environment, but should also be linked to recycling, waste reduction and packaging strategies.