Bridging the digital divide

Mind the Gap

Table A Main recommendations responsibilities and time frames

Table B All recommendations responsibilities and time frames

With regard to time frames, office holders and priorities for implementation, table II.1 shows the status of the seven main recommendations made by the Board in its report, and table II.2 shows the status of all recommendations.

Table II.2 All recommendations responsibilities and time frames

With regard to time frames, office holders and priorities for implementation, table III.1 shows the status of the 8 main recommendations made by the Board in its report, and table III.2 shows the status of all recommendations.

Table III.2 All recommendations responsibilities and time frames

With regard to time frames and office holders responsible for implementation, table IV.2 shows the status of the 30 main recommendations made by the Board in its report, and table IV.3 shows the status of all recommendations.

Table IV.3 All recommendations responsibilities and time frames

Table V.1 Main recommendations responsibilities and time frames

United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East

Time frames, office holders and priorities for implementation

With regard to time frames, office holders and priorities for implementation, table VI.1 shows the status of the 17 main recommendations made by the Board in its report, and table VI.2 shows the status of all recommendations.

Time frames, office holders and priorities for implementation

With regard to time frames, office holders and priorities for implementation, table VII.1 shows the status of the 11 main recommendations made by the Board in its report and table VII.2 shows the status of all recommendations.

Table VII.2 All recommendations responsibilities and time frames

Table VIII.1 Main recommendations responsibilities and time frames

Table VIII.2 All recommendations responsibilities and time frames

With regard to time frames, office holders and priorities for implementation, table IX.1 shows the status of the 13 main recommendations made by the Board in its report, and table IX.2 shows the status of all recommendations.

Table IX.2 All recommendations responsibilities and time frames

With regard to time frames, office holders and priorities for implementation, table X.1 shows the status of the 16 main recommendations made by the Board in its report, and table X.2 shows the status of all recommendations.

Table X.2 All recommendations responsibilities and time frames

With regard to time frames, office holders and priorities for implementation, table XI.1 shows the status for the 10 main recommendations made by the Board in its report, and table XI.2 shows the status of all recommendations.

Table XI.2 All recommendations responsibilities and time frames

With regard to time frames, office holders and priorities for implementation, table XII.1 shows the status of the first eight recommendations made by the Board in its report, and table XII.2 shows the status of all recommendations.

Table XII.2 All recommendations responsibilities and time frames

With regard to time frames, office holders and priorities for implementation, table XIII.1 shows the status of the 13 main recommendations made by the Board in its report, and table XIII.2 shows the status of all recommendations.

Table XIII.2 All recommendations responsibilities and time frames

With regard to time frames, office holders and priorities for implementation, table XIV.1 shows the status of the four main recommendations made by the Board in its report, and table XIV.2 shows the status of all 11 recommendations.

Table XIV.2 All recommendations responsibilities and time frames

Scheduling of meetings and documentation

The gap filling role

Time frames, office holders and priorities for implementation

The Board has taken note that a number of measures are already in place to avoid a similar loss of key documentation (para.

Time frames, office holders and priorities for implementation

Table VI.2 All recommendations responsibilities and time frames

Opening of the session and scheduling of meetings.

The subprogramme will continue to work to reduce the time lag between the receipt of individual complaints and their review by the relevant treaty bodies, including through efforts to modify procedures relating to complaints so as to secure more expeditious decisions.

Then the gap is divided by the shrink factor again, the list is sorted with this new gap, and the process repeats until the gap is 1.

The gap between Shanghai and the United Kingdom and the United States is as big as the gap between the U.K. and the U.S.

Closing Europe s Strategy Gap

Closing Asia s Security Gap

The timeslots are numbered from 0 to 31.

Time frames for implementation of the recommendations of the oversight bodies