The claim unit is for loss in fish catch caused by the delay as well as project expenses incurred during the period of the delay.

The largest part of the claimant's asserted losses relates to KWD 4,772,030 (USD 16,512,214) for Kuwaiti dinars that the claimant says that he received in trading his stock during the invasion and occupation period.

Sixth claim unit Claim preparation costs Iran seeks compensation in the amount of USD 4,500,000 for administrative, technical and legal expenses of the preparation of this claim.

The fifth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

Fifth claim unit Claim preparation costs Iran seeks compensation in the amount of USD 51,075 for project implementation costs.

Third claim unit Claim preparation costs Jordan seeks compensation in the amount of USD 1,700,000 for claim preparation costs for its fourth and fifth F4 instalment claims, including its public health claim.

Second claim unit Claim preparation costs Saudi Arabia seeks compensation in the amount of USD 5,874 for claim preparation costs.

At the request of Saudi Arabia, the secretariat incorporated that claim in the current claim (Claim No. 5000463).

The sixth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The third claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The claimant alleged that he suffered post traumatic stress disorder as a result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait and that his wife had a difficult delivery of their child during the invasion and occupation period.

Some of these identifiers are included in the claim form submitted by the claimant the remaining data is taken from the evidence provided by a claimant either in the original claim or in response to claim development notifications.

The first claim unit is for reduction in crop yields and the second claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

Summary of recommended awards for the claims of Iran 58

The deferred part of claim No. 5000379 has been included in claim No. 5000301.

The Panel considers that this claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

Overlapping claim

UNCC claim No. 3011623.

UNCC claim No. 1810440.

The seventh claim file was not transmitted to Iraq as the claimant objected to such transmission.

UNCC claim No. 3012161

UNCC claim No. 3011290

UNCC claim No. 3011328

UNCC claim No. 3010941

UNCC claim No. 3011574

UNCC claim No. 3011731

UNCC claim No. 3012801

UNCC claim No. 3010785

UNCC claim No. 3012091

UNCC claim No. 3010883

UNCC claim No. 3012104

UNCC claim No. 3011345

For example, in UNCC claim No. 3012105, the claimant did not include audited accounts in his original claim submission.

This claim was originally part of category F3 claim No. 5000194.

According to Iran, the claim for project expenses relates to expenses due to amortization of equipment and devices, repairs and keeping of bouyants, administrative and staff costs during the postponed period .

It should be noted that the excess amounts previously awarded in respect of the claim will be deducted from the total recommended compensation in respect of the matching category D claim.

This claim is the deferred portion of claim No. 5000259 relating to remediation of coastal mudflats.

If the claimant fails to demonstrate such authority to act, the stand alone claim fails and is not processed further.

The basis of the claim and the evidence provided to support it are similar to those provided in respect of the first claim unit.

The deferred part of claim No. 5000458 is reviewed as part of the second claim unit (terrestrial resources) of this claim.

For example, in UNCC claim No. 3012083 the claimant asserts a business loss in the amount of KWD 150,000 (USD 519,031) allegedly resulting from Iraq's directive criminalizing the use of the Kuwaiti dinars during the occupation period.

The Panel finds that the evidence as to the volume of stock held at the date of the invasion does not support the amount of stock that the claimant says was stolen, confiscated or sold during the period of Iraq's invasion and occupation.

Demands of self rule in other regions

In 1201 William decided to claim the kingdom.

In such cases, the Panel recommends no compensation.