Thanks for your explanation.

Amendments to the Commentary

The explanation was beyond my understanding.

Moreover, some of the terms and the scope thereof had been elaborated in the commentary.

In relation to paragraph (3) of the commentary, it was noted that the term claimant seemed to refer to the injured person rather than the State of nationality.

Explain to them what it is, what causes it and how it would make you feel if that was them.

As was stated in the commentary on the articles on State responsibility in the relations between States

Lecturing is often accompanied by visual aids to help students visualize an object or problem.

In this connection, it was stated that the commentary did not make a convincing case for the retention of the threshold.

It was therefore suggested that such exceptions should be identified in the text of the draft principle itself instead of the commentary.

A delegation asked for an explanation of the kind of obligations referred to under Statement 1, Miscellaneous Income, Note 5.

I am not talking about just saying haram in a disgusted way and leaving it at that, but explain in depth.

As I have been explaining, that is not what they really do, but it is convenient to call them propositional verbs.

However, it appeared to some delegations that the phrase without prejudice seemed to place diplomatic protection on an equal footing with other actions or procedures under international law.

It was also suggested the commentaries should elaborate methods of assessing environmental damage, including impairment of its non use value.

He finishes explaining that, and I'm waiting for the big 300 pound paper proposal, and he said, That's what I want from you.

The puzzle of why many cerebral processes occur with an accompanying experiential aspect in consciousness seems impossible to explain.

The view was expressed that the commentary was too brief, given the importance of the rule that the article established.

In a forthcoming publication in European Taxation, the first author discusses the negative effect that a deviating Court view has on the status of the Commentary.

Steven Schwaitzberg If you're in Latin America, you click the I want it in Spanish button and out it comes in real time in Spanish.

The decisions should be left completely to domestic courts, without an explicit position being taken by the United Nations in the Commentary.

For example, modern commentary by Professor Aust argues commercial treaties are either merely suspended or completely unaffected.

It was also suggested that the key question of who decides whether a given circumstance constitutes a waiver should be elaborated upon in the commentary.

Another view held that paragraph (3) seemed unconvincing for, if it was common knowledge that the local courts were notoriously lacking in independence , the question arose why an investor would risk investing in the country concerned.

In the opinion of the authors, this position should be accepted but the Commentary should include the possibility that, in this case, substance overrides form.

He was grateful for the clarification of the meaning of known and unknown religions, but would appreciate further clarification of the term Dodecatheists .

Although paragraph (4) of the commentary discussed the possibility of joint claims, some viewed it as failing to offer direction in respect of separate or successive claims.

For that reason, it was suggested that the commentary be expanded to include specific references to international jurisprudence, which had repeatedly affirmed the principle of customary law contained in the draft article.

The OECD examples found in the Commentary are sometimes rather dated and more up to date examples could be given.

(e) Amendments and additions in paragraph 6 of the new OECD Commentary should not be added to the United Nations amendments

(f) Paragraph 19 (eighth sentence) of the new OECD Commentary should have the words all or parts of the projects added to it

Harlem now, sort of explaining and thinking of itself in this part of the century, looking both backwards and forwards ...

People take pride in their poets and writers, but we in Gaza do the opposite Why???

And if we cannot demonstrate to these groups that if you move towards democracy, if you move towards taking part in civilized and normal standards among states, there are some rewards on the other side.

However, the Commentary on 2005 OECD article 26 (para. 4.1) states

For this reason, the authors believe that an addition to the Commentary to the effect that cases of obvious abuse shall be carefully evaluated, and that substance shall override form, is a must.

Eventual suggestions of interpretations of this nature should be better avoided in the Commentary so that there is no negative impact in respect of deviating from court rulings.

It was given to me, in the bowels of the Pentagon, by a man with a white dust jacket and a pointer who looked uncannily like Woody Allen.

2005 OECD article 26 does not have a provision overriding any such dual criminality requirement in the transmitting State and the Commentary thereon does not refer to this issue.

It was also noted in respect of pure economic loss, which according to the commentary is covered under paragraph (a)(iii), that loss or damage by impairment to the environment raised delicate issues of causation.

It would be more helpful if the commentary offered more guidance as to the meaning of prompt and adequate and it was suggested that developments in the law concerning investment could shed light on the matter.

The true explanation was reserved for Faraday, namely, that electric currents are induced in the copper disc by the cutting of the magnetic lines of force of the needle, which currents in turn react on the needle.

It was also noted that the reference in paragraph (9) of the commentary to the Kiev Protocol was not apposite since that Protocol employed a compromise formulation that covered income directly deriving from an impairment of a legally protected interest.

The Working Group also feared that the results of the forthcoming general elections could be interpreted as a mandate to introduce constitutional amendments before all the possible options for self determination had been properly explained to the public.

And here's this really sophisticated technology coming down the road, all these associated social, moral, ethical questions, and we scientists are just lousy at explaining to the public just exactly what it is we're doing in those labs.