President of the Criminal Court Damascus

1993 to March 2005 High Court Judge First Magistrate to be appointed from the Magisterial Bench directly to the High Court Bench since 1948.

Occupation High Court Judge, Judiciary Trinidad and Tobago (Retired)

The High Court forms one branch of the Supreme Court of judicature of Trinidad and Tobago. It exercises criminal and civil jurisdiction.

His case, No. 2000 0104 00, is before the single criminal court of the Guadalajara de Buga special circuit.

On 12 December 1997, the fourth collegiate criminal court upheld his conviction

Should there be prima facie evidence of a criminal offence, the case would be referred to the Assizes.

(d) Mr. del Campo was brought before criminal court No. 55 on 1 June 1992.

The chief courts are the Court of Session, for civil cases, and the High Court of Justiciary, for criminal cases.

(f) The applicant was accused under article 176 of the Criminal Law of a robbery using firearms.

Mr. F was convicted of attempted murder and a variety of property and firearms offences, and Mr. R was convicted of an offence against property.

The referral was a historic step in the field of international criminal law equally important will be the outcome of the investigations and the promotion of justice.

Criminal laws targeting all HIV carriers, however, are counter productive and inherently unjust.

Polygamy was absolutely illegal under the Criminal Code, and was subject to imprisonment of 6 months to 2 years.

In 1988, the Government of Uttar Pradesh ordered an inquiry by the Crime Branch Central Investigation Department (CBCID) of Uttar Pradesh Police.

As High Court Judge, I sat with a jury trying serious and complex criminal cases involving single and multiple accused persons of

Murder for the period of my tenure on the High Court Bench the bulk of murder trials over which I presided comprised premeditated murder.

I also held preliminary enquiries into indictable offences for transmission to the High Court should a case be made out for trial by Judge and Jury.

2.2 On 12 February 1999, the complainant was sentenced to three years' imprisonment, one of them suspended, for the above mentioned offences.

On 11 October 2003, he was charged with conspiracy to subvert the national Government and the socialist order , under article 105 of the Criminal Law of China of 1997.

Indeed, the Military Commissions Act of 2006 was written deliberately with loopholes that gave immunity to perpetrators of many kinds of sexual humiliation and abuse.

On March 14, 2012, the International Criminal Court found Thomas Lubanga, a former rebel leader in the eastern Congo, guilty of using children in armed conflict a war crime.

For example, a landmark law against organized crime entitled the Combating Organized Crime Law, 5763 2003 ( Combating Organized Crime Law ), classifies trafficking in women as a felony.

In the first case (counterfeit of six cheques), Mr. Samaali was sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment and a fine of 60,000 dinars by the criminal division of the court in Tunis in a judgement delivered on 3 February 2003, which was upheld on appeal.

On 18 November 2002, Mr. Castellanos submitted a petition calling for a review of the legality of the custodial measure to the criminal court of the Bogotá specialized circuit and submitted an appeal against the decision to close the investigation.

(a) Mr. Alfonso Martín del Campo Dodd, a Mexican citizen, was arrested on 30 May 1992 and was sentenced to 50 years' imprisonment on 28 May 1993 by criminal court No. 55 for murdering two people.

(j) The applicant was sentenced for attempted robbery using firearms, in accordance with article 15, paragraph 4, article 176, paragraph 4, and article 49 of the Criminal Law, to 9½ years' imprisonment with police supervision for 2 years.

According to the fourth criminal court, which is hearing the case, Mr. Martínez Ramírez prefers his own opinion of the expert report to that of the prosecutor's office. Thus it cannot be said that the expert report is incorrect. Rather, the appellant has an erroneous or different understanding of its merit.