Based on the Novel Peaceful Days by SHUGORO YAMAMOTO

However, he advocated retaining the words special remedy contained in the original Italian proposal.

Mr. Yamamoto (Japan) and Mr. Sandoval (Chile) expressed support for the principle of implicit derogation.

Mr. Yamamoto (Japan), Mr. Sandoval (Chile) and Mr. Nordlander (Sweden) supported the United States proposal.

Mr. Yamamoto (Japan) said that his delegation had no strong views regarding draft paragraph 1 (b).

Mr. Yamamoto (Japan) described some of the significant space related activities that had taken place in his country in the past year.

The tactical mastermind of the Pearl Harbor operation, Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, was one of them.

The composition of the Chamber for Fisheries Disputes, in order of precedence, is as follows Judge Caminos, President Judges Yamamoto, Kolodkin, Park, Wolfrum, Ndiaye and Jesus, members.

His Government was of the view that uniform rules on EDI should take the form of a model law, since the area was one of rapid technological innovations.

Mr. Yamamoto (Japan) said that his Government recognized that an opportunity currently existed to advance the Middle East process, and it had become actively engaged in that undertaking.

7. Mr. E. YAMAMOTO (Japan) said that the dramatic changes marking the end of the cold war had provided the international community with a new opportunity to create a more secure world.

After both houses of Diet refused to pass the 1914 Navy budget, Yamamoto resigned on 24 March 1914, bringing down his entire cabinet with him.

Mr. YAMAMOTO (Japan) noted with satisfaction the adoption by UNCITRAL of the Model Law on Procurement of Goods and Construction, which had been drafted by the Working Group on the New International Economic Order.

Mr. Yamamoto (Japan) said that his delegation took it that paragraph 2, as currently drafted, dealt only with cases in which a party had more than one place of business.

Mr. Yamamoto (Japan) said that his delegation could support the draft article if REIOs did not enjoy rights, especially voting rights, in addition to those of its members.

Mr. Yamamoto (Japan) stated that his delegation, which had always supported the common system, believed that its homogeneity should be preserved to keep employment conditions equal and consistent across the system as a whole.

Mr. Yamamoto (Japan) said that his delegation could not endorse the proposal to introduce a two year deadline, as such limitations were a matter of public policy in many legal systems.

54. Mr. YAMAMOTO (Japan) thanked the Legal Counsel, Mr. Fleischhauer, for his introduction to the report of the Secretary General on measures to eliminate international terrorism (A 48 267 and Add.1), which provided a useful basis for the work of the Committee.

15. Mr. YAMAMOTO (Japan) said that, in its statement in the Special Political Committee in 1992, his delegation had expressed its sincere appreciation for the completion of the work of the Principles Relevant to the Use of Nuclear Power Sources in Outer Space.

Unbeknownst to Yamamoto, who conceived the original plan, the U.S. Navy had decided as far back as 1935 to abandon 'charging' across the Pacific towards the Philippines in response to an outbreak of war (in keeping with the evolution of Plan Orange).

Mr. Yamamoto (Japan) said that draft article 6, paragraph 2, did not seem to be applicable to a case in which a party had more than one place of business but indicated a place of business that was subsequently demonstrated by a third party to be fictional.

Mr. Yamamoto (Japan) reiterated his proposal, which was that the commentary should state that draft article 2, paragraph 1 (a), covered not only consumer contracts but also other contracts concluded for personal, family or household purposes.

Mr. Yamamoto (Japan) said that his delegation had always fully supported the common system, which not only enabled each participating organization to avoid burdensome administrative arrangements but also ensured equal and consistent conditions of service, thereby eliminating unnecessary competition.

Mr. Yamamoto (Japan) said that the meaning of draft article 2, paragraph 1 (a), Contracts concluded for personal, family or household purposes , was ambiguous and should be clarified in the commentary. Otherwise States would be unsure which matters ought to be excluded by means of a declaration under draft article 18.