We will not discuss it tonight.

There's nothing to discuss.

I now have the students doing in the classroom.

There's one thing we haven't discussed.

And what else is there for us to talk about in the middle of the night?

For that is exactly what we are discussing today.

Peace is what we are discussing here today.

The item we are discussing is extremely topical for Russia.

I'm glad I'm past that. We're not going to go into that.

That is the political meaning of what we are discussing here today in the General Assembly.

It's the role of the audience in an era of pervasive electronic communications.

In fact, it's the same old topic. In a cabin, you say?

The story is fascinating and well told but there is still a great deal worth arguing.

That makes it positive and it has other properties, which we'll go over later.

I was seriously, it was something I thought we should discus privately.

Apart from the question of an increase in the Council apos s membership, the item before us also enjoins us to consider a manner of representation which would be equitable.

He actually understood something about a theme that we've been discussing all week. It's the role of the audience in an era of pervasive electronic communications.

Should the damage inflicted by a terrorist attack also be small, there would be no problem.

The topic proposed by the delegation of Denmark for our discussion today is directly relevant to the activities of the Security Council and the United Nations as a whole.

However, we would like to comment, in particular concerning our country, with reference to the item discussed today.

That was what we were to discuss here today so that we could take resolute and urgent steps that would allow us to move forward.

I wish, therefore, to expound our views on the other item that we are discussing today, namely, the Global Agenda for Dialogue among Civilizations.

Mr. SHKURTI (Albania) The item we are discussing today is related to one of the most important issues we have been dealing with for more than a year.

The problems in Africa, however, as we've been discussing for the whole of these first couple of days of TED, are major problems.

The report of the International Criminal Court, which we are debating today, details significant progress in the journey of the Court towards proving its worth as a functional and effective institution.

We believe that an open, broad debate aimed at reaching consensus is the best way to make progress on the reform we are currently discussing.

Now, even in the simple cases of symmetric encryption which we're gonna discuss in the first half of the course, there are actually two cases that we're gonna discuss in turn.

Since the need is still as relevant as the relationship, the report we are discussing must be supplemented with proposals in that connection that go beyond a merely formal relationship with the future World Trade Organization.

Global Voices has spoken to Muawiyah Alrawahi, a young blogger who has been encouraging Omanis to blog and to create public debate in their country, with the argument that the issue we don t discuss is the issue we won t solve .

On behalf of my own delegation, I hope we will act in this fashion because what is being discussed here today will be discussed in Vienna on Thursday at the Vienna Forum of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE).

Mr. SHUSTOV (Russian Federation) (interpretation from Russian) First of all, I would like say that we share the hope of the representative of Sweden that draft resolution A 48 L.18, which we are discussing, will be adopted unanimously.

Mr. Hoscheit (Luxembourg) (spoke in French) Mr. President, your presence at today's debate, convened in such a timely manner by the Danish presidency of the Security Council, stresses the importance that we must attach to the subject that we are discussing today.

Mr. Lukabu Khabouji N apos zaji (Zaire) (interpretation from French) I should like most sincerely to thank the Secretary General for his very concise report submitted to us under agenda item 37, which we are now discussing.

Here I would endorse what the delegate of India said, that consideration of a report of the kind we are now discussing should not be an annual event, but part of a much more frequent and interactive relationship between the Council and the General Assembly.

Why?, Because then I would ask you also guide us in radioactive Odyssey, and to do so they would have to sing a few truths as we are discussing here and now, and this knowledge, as may be induced, would no customers for many companies, such as pharmaceutical companies, to give just one example.

The most prominent example is the one we are discussing today the economic, commercial and financial embargo imposed by the United States against Cuba, an embargo that has been in place for over 40 years, despite overwhelming opposition in the international community.

The story is fascinating and well told but there is still a great deal worth arguing. For example, did the British decline because the US could not be stopped, or because of problems within the British Empire and at home?

The Chairman Does the House agree to break for 10 minutes? If, in view of the stage at which we are now, delegations also wish since we did not discuss the second item to consider it, or, if they have some initial comments on that item, by all means they can do so.

Mr. BOTEZ (Romania) It has been said many times that the United Nations should be reformed, and the item that we are discussing now is only a part of this much needed process aimed at better adapting our half century old world Organization to the problems that will face the world during the next century.