Selecting Our Children

My colleague and I also live a life of our choice in the country of our birth under a Government of our choosing.

And it's also ours to lose.

That's why we picked it.

Why do we choose paper?

Truly, their fate depends upon our choice.

What is wrong with the people that we have chosen?

And here are the ones we've selected.

So A is definitely our choice.

Selecting our children raises more profound ethical problems.

Think about how we select our judges in this country.

We construct a representation of our interest by choosing to follow or like specific pages.

The strategy we chose was to balance and integrate.

It is by our own free choice, by our personal efforts, that we will achieve balance with nature and so become like all of nature.

Now you can see why we choose this particular way of cutting up the square.

Despite all these constraints, we have been able thanks to the judiciousness of our choices and our economic decisions to achieve tangible results.

This was supposed to be the difference between eating and not eating for the next month.

Our choice is not methods based on the use of force, but rather the search for a political settlement.

When we pick up a book, turn on the TV, or watch a movie, we're carried away down the currents of story into a world of imagination.

We have picked up the image of God, (that's our relationship with God) and smashed it by going our own way in preference to God's way.

After decades of struggle against dictatorship and foreign domination, we secured our freedom and independence in 1979 by establishing a political system of our own choosing.

We chose nonviolence not from cowardice or weakness, but out of moral conviction we don t want to reach victory by having destroyed the country.

This was our conscious choice, dictated in the first place by the fact that the people of Kazakhstan have first hand experience of the terrible consequences of atomic weapons tests.

Even if we choose to be silent, we chose to be silent, and we're communicating something by choosing to be silent.

The reason we picked it is because this is a technical university, and I believe that wood is the most technologically advanced material I can build with.

In the last video we saw that choice A is true. Now lets see if B, C, and D are also true. So choice B they're telling us that the argument, let me rewrite it over here in another color.

To ask, What is the cheapest possible stuff that you could make a diagnostic system out of, and get useful information, add function? And what we've chosen is paper.

Getting the economic environment right is, by the way the avenue we have chosen to assist the process, although we do finance diversification projects or projects with strong diversification components.

In short, the paradox of choice (as elegantly described in an eponymous book by Barry Schwartz) is that too many choices confuse us and raise the possibility of regret how can we be sure that we are getting just what we want, and that something else would not be better?

There is a Sunni sheikh, there's a Shiite sheikh, there's the seven leaders of the seven major tribes, there's a Christian, there's a Sabian, there are female representatives, there's every political party in this council, what's wrong with the people that we chose?

Between law and injustice based on the law of the strongest, our choice should be easy, if it is our desire as I hope it is to bring lasting peace and security back to that region so that its peoples may live in mutual respect and perfect harmony.

Another way to think about it, is that ratio of corresponding sides is the same. so, if we say this side JK corresponds to side ZY. and here we have to take our pick as all of the sides have the same length. we say that the ratio between these two sides so JK over ZY is equal to 5 over 7.5

Without prejudging our choice of the new item, I should like to recall that in resolution 47 54 A the Assembly noted the support for the proposal to include an item entitled General guidelines for non proliferation, with special emphasis on weapons of mass destruction .

Who.

Whowho.

Your Majesty. Who, who, who?

Rays consisting of electrons that are emitted from Atoms of radioactive elements.

Unknown.

Of who?

Who? Who?

Who else?

Anyway, who...?

Of whom?

Who?

We are like a leaf floating on the ocean. The waves push us.