(b) Trial by jury

You want a hostile jury on your hands?

Don't forget, there are all kinds of grand juries...

Got a big white man's jury here. The verdict's already in.

He was convicted by an all white jury of rape, kidnapping and vehicle theft.

I mean, I've never been on a jury before.

With no jury or judge, would be wasting our breath.

Right?

2.8 On 10 January 2001, Messrs. F and R were arraigned before the Serres Mixed Criminal Court, comprising three judges and four jurors.

I only hope he has an allwoman jury.

To preserve legal formalities, I must ask you, as jurors, ...is the defendant guilty or not guilty?

A person charged with that offence, therefore, would have the right to trial by jury.

Throughout the trial proceedings, he was assisted by legal counsel and the services of sworn interpreters.

If you're accused of a crime, you have the right to a speedy public trial and an impartial jury.

Australia is not advocating that the statute make provision for trial by jury.

This is why such cases are dealt with in the High Court, with a jury, at first instance.

This kid wouldn't stand a chance with another jury, and you know it.

No jury can declare a man guilty unless it's sure.

I've seldom seen a murder jury selected and sworn in less than half a day.

Now, in America, in fact, you cannot give up your right to trial by jury.

References External links Federal Jury Instruction Resource Page Collecting model or pattern federal civil and criminal jury instructions for trial courts by jurisdiction (where available) and subject matter.

The board could include three judges, the judge and the jury or the judge and representatives of the estates.

In the United States, a verdict in most criminal trials by jury must be unanimous.

A study by Clark (1994) uses a jury setting from the film 12 Angry Men to investigate social influence.

This Tribunal does not need to shackle itself to restrictive rules that have developed out of the ancient trial by jury system.

You don't think any jury in the world... would convict a boy that gave the best years of his life to serving his country, do you?

What we have extant right now, at the beginning of this system, is the U.N. Security Council as a grand jury.

Trial by jury, which was infrequent anyway, is being seen less and less.

Some nations do not use juries at all, or rely on theological or military authorities to issue verdicts.

Ladies and gentlemen, if I say to you that you have been a good jury, you will take the compliment, make your decision and go on about your day.

But if I say to you that you are an honorable jury, and that I hope your unshakeable determination to better the vocabulary of humanity will result in finding good and bad guilty, you will recognize the ingenuity of this argument and find good and bad guilty.

For example, as ombudsman, I was opposed to curtailing the right of Russians to jury trials.

These types of courts deal only with a specific type of case and they are usually presided over by a single judge without a jury.

This function may be performed by a judge, a panel of judges, or a jury panel composed of unbiased citizens.

Impartiality must first result from an objective observation of the facts for example, the personal conduct of a judge or jury member before or during trial.

In October 1991, a jury of five persons found Jorge Miranda guilty of murder and acts of terrorism. 520

57. As in other common law countries, trial by jury is a fundamental element of Australia apos s legal system.

This is a jury simulation deliberation room, and you can see beyond that two way mirror jury advisers standing in a room behind the mirror.

This will make it possible to appeal against the actions of the prosecutor before a jury of the court which will not have the right afterwards to try the case

The Committee notes that the rule laid down in article 5 (a) applies to all types of judicial proceedings, including trial by jury.

The second trial The second trial began January 11, 1922, with a new jury, but with the same legal defense and prosecution as well as the same presiding judge.

Section 80 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia guarantees a right for a person charged with an indictable offence under any law of the Commonwealth to be tried by a jury.

Lawyers take cases on contingency with the hope of a big share of a big settlement by a sympathetic jury, because this patient really ended up badly.

There is no trial by jury rather, judges make rulings alone or, in the case of criminal trials, with two other judges as observers.

In October 1995, a Houston jury convicted Saldívar of first degree murder and sentenced her to life in prison, with the possibility of parole in 2025.