Well, that's for the grand jury to decide.

That you mind explaining to the jury what you mean by Briber ?

Counsel is now making a veiled suggestion to the jury.

Keep him on as long as you can. The jury likes him.

Shouts out to the the North West Grand Jury Resistance

He leaves that to hear Brother Prosecutor would lower as to pay a bribe?

However, the Court did not instruct the jurors that they would need to be convinced that the prosecution had managed to prove that the confession was voluntary.

Similarly, it is for the appellate courts of States parties and not for the Committee to review the judge apos s instructions to the jury or the conduct of the trial, unless it is clear that the instructions to the jury were arbitrary or amounted to a denial of justice, or that the judge manifestly violated his obligation of impartiality.

You told the jury that the Colonel didn't usually take burgundy... because it disagreed with him.

5.3 The Committee notes that the author apos s allegations that he did not have a fair trial relate to the evaluation of evidence and to the instructions given by the judge to the jury.

8.2 Counsel argues that it is irrelevant that the case file was not given to the jurors and that only some of the documents were used in the trial.

Internships with the International Commission of Jurors (Geneva) and the Centro de Investigación y Educación Popular (Colombia), and clerkships in the United States Court of International Trade, New York, and the United States District Court, Eastern District, New York.

Mr. Swanson, explain to the jury why you did not recognize me, while we chatted, but are able to identify a thief with which you have been in contact for a minute.

3.7 In an additional submission, the author alleges that his trial was unfair because no stenographers were present throughout its duration, that the judge himself took the notes, and that only the judge apos s summing up to the jury was made available in the form of a transcript.

6.2 The Committee further considered that some of the authors apos allegations pertained to the issue of the adequacy of the judge apos s instructions to the jury, in particular to the issue of the treatment of identification evidence and the possibility of a manslaughter verdict.

Similarly, it is not for the Committee to review specific instructions to the jury by the trial judge, unless it can be ascertained that the instructions to the jury were arbitrary or amounted to a denial of justice, or that the judge manifestly violated his obligation of impartiality.

9.3 The Committee further notes that the State party has argued that not all documents in the case file were of relevance to the defence, and that only 15 documents were presented by the prosecution in Court and were therefore available to the jurors, out of which only four police reports were not available in English or in English translation.

He also stated that there were no statistics on foreigners who might have been subjected to police brutality or on the conduct of the police in urban as opposed to rural areas and that sufficient evidence against 11 of the 15 persons charged with false accusations against the police in Bergen had been established by the jury.

4.3 After explaining the operation of section 108 of the Courts apos Act (governing the disqualification of jurors), the State party points out that it is not uncommon for jurors to have negative feelings towards the defendant in a criminal case, but that this does not imply that they are incapable of giving the defendant a fair hearing.