In playing this toy, you kind of this will bring up philosophical questions in you.

Ishmael is a 1992 philosophical novel by Daniel Quinn.

It is a philosophical novel written in form of allegory of the human life.

The population objection raises a deeper philosophical question.

The Picture of Dorian Gray is an 1891 philosophical novel by writer and playwright Oscar Wilde.

They moved beyond being purely philosophical to becoming major political forces after becoming involved in the cause of reform.

To some viewers, the characters are psychological representations, while to others, they are philosophical, religious, historical, and even themselves.

The former universalism and regionalism in human rights raised philosophical questions of cultural relativism which fall outside the scope of the Study.

Political and philosophical differences about the nature of terrorism must not be used as an excuse for inaction.

The earthquake had an especially large effect on the contemporary doctrine of optimism, a philosophical system which implies that such events should not occur.

Now she used a small war to avert a larger war, so we stopped and had a very good philosophical discussion about whether that was right, conditional good, or not right.

The State party affirms that many subjects taught at school may include information or actions perceived to have philosophical or religious aspects.

Sir Nigel Rodley questioned the distinction between conscientious objection on religious grounds and on philosophical or moral grounds. Why did objectors on philosophical and moral grounds have to serve longer than those who objected on religious grounds?

While acknowledging that alternative service was less onerous than military service, he nonetheless wondered how the extended terms of unarmed and alternative service were calculated and whether their duration truly reflected their nature and difficulty.

I try to figure out intellectually, philosophically, psychologically, what the experience of beauty is, what sensibly can be said about it and how people go off the rails in trying to understand it.

And some of them would say something else. They would say, No, you know, this is a celebration of female specialness, it helps build that and it's a result of the fact that and this is arguably a sophisticated psychological view that male lust is not to be trusted.

In contrast to Faust Part One , the focus here is no longer on the soul of Faust, which has been sold to the devil, but rather on social phenomena such as psychology, history and politics, in addition to mystical and philosophical topics.

Beyond undermining the gene centered theories of evolution that have dominated public consciousness for several decades, these developments call for new philosophical frameworks.

The period of service added for conscientious objectors was even longer if the objection was based on philosophical or moral beliefs rather than religious ones, eleven months as opposed to six.

And it's not based on theology or philosophy, it's in the study of the mind, across all these spheres of research, from neuroscience to the cognitive scientists, behavioral economists, psychologists, sociology, we're developing a revolution in consciousness.

Moreover, there was a historically important and ethically oriented humanism in China as early as the fifth century B.C. The concept of ren, which corresponds to our humanum is a central term in the Chinese tradition.

This may sound utopian in a way, it is. But at a time when every digital service becomes more and more personalized, why should social policy remain confined to the philosophy and solutions of the twentieth century?

Moreover, there was a historically important and ethically oriented humanism in China as early as the fifth century B.C. The concept of ren, which corresponds to our humanum is a central term in the Chinese tradition.

I essentially drag sledges for a living, so it doesn't take an awful lot to flummox me intellectually, but I'm going to read this question from an interview earlier this year Philosophically, does the constant supply of information steal our ability to imagine or replace our dreams of achieving?

How could it be otherwise, since they know that justice rendered by people for other people is a complex matter, because deep philosophical issues are involved. Justice handed down by people for States is just as difficult and complicated a matter, given the considerable interests that are increasingly at stake.