That's inductive reasoning.

What charge? Defending the sovereignty of the Philippines.

A smear?

And you often hear another type of reasoning, inductive reasoning.

What charge?

What charge?

On what charge?

On what charge?

This was a very dangerous accusation.

You'd be facing a murder charge.

We'll think of one.

Well, this is more of what I had just talked about, inductive reasoning.

By inductive reasoning, if we know the cause and effects, we can infer the principles.

Then, in part three, we'll look at a different kind of argument, inductive arguments.

Instead of this petty charge against him, you could get something big something that would chuck him in a concentration camp for years...

Wait. Prison? Under what law?

You accuse me of faithlessness?

Nothing. You're going to let her go to trial for murder?

with a murder charge hanging over me.

one of murder.

A charge has been lodged against this woman.

A4.3.11.3 The health effects included in the SDS should be consistent with those described in the studies used for the classification of the substance or mixture.

The police accused him of murder.

(Medina was acquitted of murder.)

What felony did those people commit?

The charge of apostasy, however, has not been dealt with.

It's going to save me from a charge of murder, the police are after me now!

I promised to drop the pickpocket charge if you played ball.

And what do you want me to do?

I'm apt to attack you physically and then accuse you of rape.

But the charge of Sedition is a major offense.

However, all inductive reasoning where data is too scarce for statistical relevance is inherently based on anecdotal evidence.

All of them were charged with the deaths of the churchwomen.

All accused were acquitted on the count of crimes against humanity.

Not dump. Do you know about obstructing justice?

There's one charge against him, to start with.

Premeditated murder is the most serious charge tried in our criminal courts.

... tothinkof acharge, which makes it awkward.

You learned your husband has killed another woman to keep his affair secret.

She get nailed on some bullshit possession charge.

So intellectual capture is a charge hard to refute. But were regulators surrogate lobbyists for the financial industry?

That is a charge that we must not permit history to levy against us.

Or their hypothetical charge, by losing those four electrons, has gone up by four.

Make it a charge. Isn't that police procedure in Mexico?

Garcia Ordonez has invoked the charge of treason... against Rodrigo of Vivar.