a transaction involving securities

This will require an extensive swap of private debts for equity.

Credit lines secured by home equity provided another new way to finance spending.

Fast program trading pulls the overall holding period average down.

I have my E Trade account, you have your Charles Schwab account, we just traded the stock.

Debt equity swaps rescue the banks without rescuing their shareholders.

Debt equity swaps would be a much better way to recapitalize the banks.

The typical bank is capitalized with equity, long term debt, short term debt, and deposits.

Moreover, there are ambiguities in the trend lines for stock holding periods.

Debt equity swaps have been used successfully in many cases, and they follow from normal bankruptcy procedures.

There are C5 BA and C5 SOS claims in the fourth instalment.

Thus, a debt equity swap of less than 7.5 of the creditors investment would be enough to compensate for the banks losses.

Indeed, the average holding period for America s core shareholders, like Fidelity and Vanguard, has increased in recent decades.

Indeed, if, as some believe, only a fraction of the banks equity is at risk, the potential debt equity swaps would be minuscule.

Proponents of this view point to furious trading in New York and London, with average holding periods for major stocks diminishing in recent decades.

The Panel further finds that only claimsone claim for C5 SOS areis compensable.

But it s not as clear as many believe that the holding period for traditional shareholders has shortened greatly or at all.

(a) Develop, administer and maintain systems for the investment management of the assets of the Fund and for the processing of equity recommendations and orders, and administer the data consolidation and research systems supplied by financial institutions.

The financial industry complains that efforts to force greater equity funding would curtail lending, but this is just nonsense in a general equilibrium setting.

An asset diet rich in equities and direct investment and low in debt cannot substitute for other elements of fiscal and financial health.

Thereafter, 90 do what they have always done hold for three years. But the other 10 sell their shares every four months to a new set of shareholders.

Forcing a debt for equity swap or debt forgiveness would be no greater a violation of private property rights than a massive bailout.

RIO DE JANEIRO Since late last year, a series of positive developments has boosted investor confidence and led to a sharp rally in risky assets, starting with global equities and commodities.

The Securities Committee, under the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Belarus and its inspectorates, monitor professional participants in the securities market, persons engaged in exchange activities and lottery organizers

Admati and her colleagues recommend requirements that force financial firms to generate equity funding either through retained earnings or, in the case of publicly traded firms, through stock issuance.

If institutional investors refuse to hold stocks for more than a few months, the thinking goes, CEOs time horizons for corporate planning must shrink to roughly the same timeframe.

As during the Great Depression and in many debt restructurings, it makes sense in the current contingency to mandate partial debt forgiveness or a debt for equity swap in the financial sector.

If G 20 governments stood back and asked themselves how to channel a much larger share of the imbalances into equity like instruments, the global financial system that emerged just might be a lot more robust than the crisis prone system that we have now.

Higher capital requirements mean, in essence, more equity funding and by implication, under any sensible definition relatively less debt for a given balance sheet size. This is an attractive and sensible policy, because today s global banks have relatively small slivers of equity underpinning their operations.

And, even if the banks private depositors, whose claims are 39 of the aggregate balance sheet, were excluded, the debt equity swap necessary to compensate for a loss of up to 100 of the equity would be less than 12 of the creditors investment volume.

Forcing a debt for equity swap or debt forgiveness would be no greater a violation of private property rights than a massive bailout. But, for the major players in the financial sector, it is much more appealing to be bailed out by the taxpayers.

British banks have made less progress with tangible common equity, rising from just under 3 to a little over 4 , but they have significantly reduced their reliance on wholesale funding, from almost 45 in 2008 to less than 35 now.

The Panel therefore recommends awardsan award of compensation in respect of one C5 SOS claims and no awards of compensation in respect of C5 SOS claims and all C5 BA claims in the fourth instalment.

As during the Great Depression and in many debt restructurings, it makes sense in the current contingency to mandate partial debt forgiveness or a debt for equity swap in the financial sector. It is a well tested strategy, and it leaves taxpayers out of the picture.