Iraq s voters have spoken.

Voters vs. the Welfare State

Above all, sophisticated voters will themselves be emotionally intelligent enough to be prepared for surprises.

They voted not for symbols but for issues.

China s leaders will make their choices, as will German voters.

Voters heavily punished almost all national governments.

Irish voters may reject the fiscal compact in a referendum.

Defying such sour predictions, voters clearly felt that elections matter.

Voters overwhelmingly returned Thaksin to office in February 2005.

The polls are very close, and voters have not yet locked in their decisions.

It began well, when Spanish voters approved the draft European Union constitution, but it turned sour when French and Dutch voters spurned it soon after.

It is about time that German voters understood that the largest grasshoppers are in the center of their own towns.

The voters did not find it credible.

Electors chose only a representative for the House of Commons, and the majority party then appointed the prime minister.

Voters are feeling the pain of economic isolation, made worse by the global downturn.

Russian voters, the establishment, and intellectuals sense that Putinism has already lost.

Voters may prefer Lopez Obrador, but they value Mexico s stability above all.

So Germany will be left with a grand coalition just as the German electorate wanted.

The elections took place under a list system, whereby voters chose from a list of parties and coalitions.

When it comes to managing a deep and complex crisis, indeed, European voters tend to prefer the experience of conservative politicians.

In last May's national elections, India's rural voters unseated the ruling coalition.

BEIRUT Lebanon s voters have handed a clear defeat to the Hezbollah led March 8 alliance.

Across Latin America, voters voicing their economic hopes have opted for a new left.

And the man whom US voters choose to lead their country will affect the lives of everyone, not just Americans.

What a damaging blow to the extremists, whose ideology the voters so clearly rejected.

Many voters are following suit, drawn mainly to Enríquez Ominami.

It does not take long for voters to discover that the promises of populists were empty.

Democratic consent can truly be given only when voters know what they are consenting to.

After five years of decline in living standards, voters oppose more austerity and further retrenchment without growth.

The writer, Thomas Frank, says that this might be a kind of explanation why some voters vote against their best interests, that voters, like a lot of us, assume, that if they hear something that sounds like it's sincere, that it's coming from the gut, that it's passionate, that it's more authentic.

As long as voters are worried about their wallets, Democrats and Republicans will compete to defend American workers.

The electors will indicate the candidates for whom they wish to vote by placing crosses against their names on the ballot papers.

Luxembourg s voters, for example, approved it by a 56.5 majority immediately after the Dutch and French no votes.

Given the opportunity to vote, voters turned to a party not unlike Thaksin s pre coup Thai Rak Thai.

Voters will learn to compromise, replacing tailor made niche parties with a couple of solid off the shelf options.

And no wonder that voters in almost two thirds of eurozone countries have turned out the incumbents in their most recent elections.

To be able to vote, voters must be included in the electoral register of their polling district and must have a polling card.

From the outside looking in it seems almost perverse that Irish voters might reject the Lisbon Treaty.

Voters were unable to choose between the incumbent and the opposition, because the same centrist parties were in office all the time.

In fact, Americans do not need a new political party with Obama s reelection, voters have endorsed precisely that credo of pragmatic idealism.

Unless voters hear about the positive impact that their generosity is having, they will inevitably focus on issues closer to home.

In some countries, voters expect presents and gifts from political parties and candidates and make their decisions on the basis of the amount and quality of gifts.

By being informed of the candidates' prospective standing in an election, voters may freely form or modify their own opinion about the candidates.

Second, the electorate grasped the importance of re electing a modest but wise and determined leader who understood the direction India needed to take.

Under this system, voters can only vote for political parties as a whole, and thus have no influence on the order in which candidates are elected.