Dramatic irony, though, is what we will be looking at right now.

This is the paradox of the 1930 s.

Dramatic irony is when the audience seems to know more about an event, a situation, or a conversation than the characters in the movie, on the show, or in the book do.

This paradox is what got me interested in complex systems.

This is the paradox that I used in this title,

The other variable that's important is the type of neighborhood that you live in.

Verbal irony is when someone says something, but truly means the opposite.

The Asian Paradox

The African Paradox

The Green Paradox

The Islamic Democratic Paradox

Herein lies the great paradox.

I embody the central paradox.

So, when you feel like you are in on a secret, that is dramatic irony, a hallmark of all the great writers, from Shakespeare to Hitchcock.

Therein lies the paradox the criteria are unworkable.

And while the numbers I'll be giving you are not the exact same that UC Berkeley found, the paradox is indeed the same and is often called, Simpson's Paradox.

Paradoxically as it seems, it is the symbiosis of their works that make up a complete operating system known as GNU Linux, or just Linux.

So you've got this massive mismatch everyone knows that if they share they're going to get HlV, but they're all sharing anyway.

There is no shortage of examples.

They offer a paradox.

The problem of paradoxes.

So that's why I say there's a little bit of irony here.

Now, in this paradox between love and desire, what seems to be so puzzling is that the very ingredients that nurture love mutuality, reciprocity, protection, worry, responsibility for the other are sometimes the very ingredients that stifle desire.

And yet, the irony is, the only way we can ever do anything new is to step into that space.

Nevertheless, there is something paradoxical about this.

But the paradox is more apparent than real.

The result of credit compulsion was rather paradoxical.

But the irony is, of course, that Angela can do this because she's the one person who you know would never, ever, ever break any rules of Wikipedia.

The paradox is that the distance between decision makers and those represented seems to grow, in spite of the increase in the speed and volume of communications.

But the irony is, of course, that Angela can do this because she's the one person who you know would never, ever break any rules of Wikipedia.

What is the cause of this seeming paradox? Is there any hope?

But the irony isn't that there isn't any food in North Korea.

Paradoxically, it was God who created hell as a place to store evil.

So you've got this massive mismatch everyone knows that if they share they're going to get HIV, but they're all sharing anyway.

Yet a long succession of presidents failed to solve the paradox.

Most ironic is the self fulfilling critique that many activists now use.

So I think something will always happen that prevents the paradox.

One effect, paradoxically, is that it produces paralysis, rather than liberation.

But the irony is that it might only be in recognizing our limitations that we can really actually overcome them.

So we had to come up with a contrast. We don't want you writing legacy code.

The irony, however, is that withdrawal might lead the West into a new, far more dangerous regional war as Iran proceeds toward its goal of developing nuclear weapons.

The paradox is that this has been good for holding the line on protectionism.

The fact that Ecuadoran President Rafael Correa has emerged as Assange s foremost ally is profoundly ironic.

The explanation of that paradox is that, within our societies, we're looking at relative income or social position, social status where we are in relation to each other and the size of the gaps between us.

And that sometimes leads to bit of a divergence in why we're doing what we're doing.