But when you invert both sides of an inequality, you switch the inequality, right?

So we have this inequality.

So that is our inequality.

So the inequality will switch.

So if I'm inverting all of the sides of this inequality, I have to switch the inequality signs.

And remember, when you multiply or divide both sides of an inequality by a negative, you swap the inequality.

So we have this inequality.

You have this inequality right there.

And when you multiply both sides of an inequality by a negative number or divide both sides by a negative number, you swap the inequality.

Universality of presence versus differentiated structures

the system for reconciling disparate parts.

You don't do anything to the inequality

It does not satisfy that inequality.

That won't change the inequality.

As networks developed, the protocols spread with the networks.

Now we're gonna divide both sides of this equation by 13.

And that's one of the distinctions of an inequality.

We're actually injecting contrast into the organ.

Now we can divide both sides of this inequality by 5 and we don't have to swap the inequality because we're dividing by a positive number and so we get z is less than 20 over 5.

It is thus a true reflection of our diverse tendencies.

So this is the interval notation for this compound inequality right there.

No reason to change the inequality just yet.

So the inequality is 2 times x plus 6 is less than or equal to 8x.

Financial networks

Local Networks

Dialup Networks

Available networks

Normal Grid

Dense Grid

Draw Grids

And you start seeing these networks, this cosmic web of structure forming.

Las Vegas, we just solve for I on this inequalty.

And since we divided by a negative number, we swap the inequality.

We can divide both sides of this inequality by 3.

Once again, no reason to change the inequality just yet.

Alright? We could have done this equation in a slightly different way

Networking

Fake Network Management

networking is enabled

Systems training

Mobilization of institutional networks

If you take those networks, this idea of networks, and you apply universal principles, mathematizable, universal principles, all of these scalings and all of these constraints follow, including the description of the forest, the description of your circulatory system, the description within cells.

So the inequality stays the same as in our original problem.

It's only when you multiply by negatives that you swap the inequality.

It's simply that English is not adapted to the demands of intercultural communication.