That statement and these two statements are equivalent.

So what's the difference in these two statements?

Either one, those are symmetric statements. They mean the exact same thing.

This statement right here is completely equivalent to these two statements.

I will also provide That's two sentences starting with I.

(b) Replace the third and fourth sentences with the following

I utter these two sentences with inhalation you take this thought

In the title, insert AND MIXTURES after SUBSTANCES .

You deduced this last statement from these two other statements that you knew were true.

This paragraph should be separated into two, one for each of the two sentences.

The proposal (see annex II, sect. W) seeking to insert in the text the following two sentences

They can easily hold the weight of these two complete sentences because they are distributed evenly on both arms.

In other words, the first couple of sentences here, assuming this is a grape plant make a root, make a branch, create a blossom.

The third and final condition represents an output dependency When two segments write to the same location, the result comes from the logically last executed segment.

Despite the fact that no specific proposals regarding the relationship between the first and the second sentence of article 28 were made in the questionnaire, a significant number of delegations have commented on that issue.

However, it was also indicated that the first and the second sentence of draft article 74 related to different matters, the second sentence being intended to relate strictly to arrest of ships, and that the second sentence in draft article 74 should therefore be kept in a separate article.

2.8 Nor can I follow the Committee apos s argument in paragraph 9.2 (fourth and fifth sentences) where an attempt is made to create a link between the purpose (and thus the legality) of the restrictive legislation as such and its application in a concrete case.

We agree, as the majority in the Committee does in the first two sentences in paragraph 7.4 of the Views, that the absence of protection from discrimination on the ground of political opinion in the Ontario Human Rights Code raises an issue under article 26 of the Covenant.

The law should also specify that, if the applicable law is not determined pursuant to the preceding two sentences, the applicable law is to be determined pursuant to fallback rules based on article 5 of the Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Certain Rights in Respect of Securities Held with an Intermediary.