The group table on the right lists the results of all such compositions possible.

The solution is that these constructions, despite initial appearance, are not synonymous, that when you crank up the microscope on human cognition, you see that there's a subtle difference in meaning between them.

One conceptual construct for representing flows of all economic transactions that take place in an economy is a social accounting matrix with accounts in each respective row column entry.

So which verbs go in which construction the problem with which I began depends on whether the verb specifies a kind of motion or a kind of possession change.

So, a problem in explaining how children learn language, a problem in teaching language to adults so that they don't make grammatical errors, and a problem in programming computers to use language is which verbs go in which constructions.

It seems to be based on a fixed set of concepts, which govern dozens of constructions and thousands of verbs not only in English, but in all other languages fundamental concepts such as space, time, causation and human intention, such as, what is the means and what is the ends?