A physicist looks for larger, more symmetric patterns that include the established pattern as a subset.

And so with the standard method, the cells do fire, they just don't fire in the normal firing patterns because they don't have the right code.

Believe all patterns are real

Some patterns are real and some are not.

Given such patterns, here was our idea.

That is, how accurate we are in finding patterns.

The other one also, but maybe too many patterns.

Because, let's face it, some patterns are real.

And so with the standard method, the cells do fire, they just don't fire in the normal firing patterns because they don't have the right code.

So these patterns of charges are not just pretty.

Here are three sets of firing patterns.

Yet again, your pattern detection devices are fooled.

The larger pattern allows us to predict the existence of particles that have never been seen.

One pattern, I call the slow hunch, that break through ideas almost never come in a moment of great insight in a sudden stroke of inspiration.

You miss the real patterns. You don't want to be too skeptical.

So we can't just uniformly dismiss all patterns like that.

One sees maybe just the right number of patterns to win a Nobel Prize.

At the end of each day, you have to fill out these forms I've had mimeographed.

As we spin it, we can see many of the other intricate patterns contained in this one.

Now, what if we don't care about alleles, we actually care about the frequency of the genotypes?

It's a sensitivity to the physical environment, the ability to pick out patterns in an environment derive a gist.

Our right hemisphere appears to be where a lot of this patternicity occurs.

So you're more likely to feel in a euphoric state, creativity, find more patterns.

This is a fairly new one that throws us off because of the conflicting patterns of comparing this angle with that angle.

We haven't put any negative exponents in yet, but I think you'll see that the same patterns apply.

But what I wanted to do here is to show you that many different genotypes so these are all different genotypes

So you can see that it's pretty limited, and because the firing patterns aren't in the right code, they're very limited in what they can tell you about what's out there.

And so I think that we evolved ... there was a natural selection for the propensity for our belief engines, our pattern seeking brain processes, to always find meaningful patterns and infuse them with these sort of predatory or intentional agencies that I'll come back to.

You can think of these short motifs that repeat over and over again as words, and these words occur in sentences.

Can we reconstruct what the retina was seeing from the responses from the firing patterns?

Again, I'm putting your anterior cingulate cortex to the test here, causing you conflicting pattern detections.

little green baskets that you can throw different combinations of genotypes in.

We find patterns, we make those connections, whether it's Pavlov's dog here associating the sound of the bell with the food, and then he salivates to the sound of the bell, or whether it's a Skinnerian rat, in which he's having an association between his behavior and a reward for it, and therefore he repeats the behavior.

See, our pattern detection device, which appears to be located in the anterior cingulate cortex it's our little detection device there can be easily fooled, and this is the problem.

That is the tendency to infuse patterns with meaning, intention and agency, often invisible beings from the top down.

So the default position is just Believe all patterns are real All rustles in the grass are dangerous predators and not just the wind.

But even when I take it away, the illusion is so powerful because of how are brains are wired to find those certain kinds of patterns.

So there's only one last combination because these are the only two types of alleles we might see in our population, although for most genes, there's more than two types.

See, our pattern detection device, which appears to be located in the anterior cingulate cortex it's our little detection device there can be easily fooled, and this is the problem.

And the point of this, if you didn't catch that, is that tiles are a kind of molecular program and they can output patterns.

Tree bark is particularly good because it's nice and grainy, branchy, black and white splotchy and you can get the pattern seeking humans are pattern seeking animals.

But what we're hoping when we get to Planck, we'll have resolution about equivalent to the resolution you see of the Earth there, where you can really see the complicated pattern that exists on the Earth.

Each bird has its own repertoire with more proficient birds having a range of up to 35 variable song types and as many as 14 types of clicks.

The reason why we're making all of those assumptions is because, if we can assume this, we can start to deduce some things about what we observe, what must be the genotypes in the population or the frequencies of different phenotypes and whatever else.

there was a natural selection for the propensity for our belief engines, our pattern seeking brain processes, to always find meaningful patterns and infuse them with these sort of predatory or intentional agencies that I'll come back to.