Belarus

Mexico s War of Choice

North Korea s Choice

Any decision to detain a person incommunicado could be challenged on the grounds of constitutionality or unreasonableness by way of a judicial review.

Sheena Iyengar on the art of choosing

Women have the right to choose.

We have a choice.

So choices have to be made.

Empowerment is the freedom to choose.

We have copious knowledge, which enables us to split the atom, but we do not have enough rationality to prevent the misuse of nuclear fission for the manufacture of nuclear weapons.

The Mixed Blessing of Genetic Choice

The choice today is clear.

Each radio button is normally accompanied by a label describing the choice that the radio button represents.

The choice appalls voters.

From War of Choice to War Without End

The choices to be made are not simple, obvious, or clear cut.

Contractual choice of application of the draft instrument

According to the source, Mr. Martínez Ramírez' arrest, while consistent with the legislation in force, was a violation of his rights, since it was carried out in violation of the principles of reasonableness, proportionality and predictability.

In fact, though all humans share a basic need and desire for choice, we don't all see choice in the same places or to the same extent.

Choice is the essence of governance, and to abstain from it for whatever reason is to shirk responsibility.

(a) The case of The Government of South Africa v. Grootboom illustrates how courts adapt legal concepts such as the test of reasonableness to assess whether a policy with resource implications is compatible with constitutional rights.

The choice will depend on the characteristics of the country.

Today, that choice must be made anew.

From this hard choice arises another dilemma.

Further, provided that any force met the statutory reasonableness requirement, it could not be said that it amounted to cruel or unusual treatment or punishment.

The trouble is that Germany has not been forced to choose.

There is always a choice, and there are always consequences.

Choice is everything.

And I strongly believe that this is the choice that should have never emerged.

The Court applied a test of reasonableness to the housing policy and concluded that the housing policy did not meet this test, as a reasonable part of the national housing budget was not devoted to people in desperate need.

But simply choosing between expansion and austerity is not the whole story.

It will address adverse selection by including an individual mandate.

But even this comparison involves a selection bias.

This would force people to exercise choice.

And I have decided to go for the second option, although it is not easy.

Following a review, the organizing team selected 15 people to take part.

Others wondered how such a selection was made in the first place

This second option, however, would have a serious limitation.

This is subject to the provision of transparent and verifiable information that the choice will not increase the expected net anthropogenic greenhouse gas removals by sinks.

The Committee recalls its jurisprudence that the requirement of reasonableness implies that any interference with privacy must be proportionate to the end sought, and must be necessary in the circumstances of any given case.

Of course, such a choice carries risks. Do we know the people we would be helping?

Here, too, reality does not seem to have endorsed Free to Choose.

Europe, however, is not obliged to choose between catastrophe and mutualization of debt.

Europe does not face a choice between soft and hard power.

Upon election, a decision by a Party will be fixed for the first commitment period.