We're the ones who let the second replicator out of its box, and we can't push it back in.

(c) the subject matter of the proceeding is the recruitment, renewal of employment or reinstatement of an individual

There was unanimous support for the High Commissioner in reaffirming protection as being the core function of his Office.

There was unanimous support for the High Commissioner in reaffirming protection as being the core function of his Office.

On February 19, the Bulgarian police arrested Hadjiev with the intention of sending him back to face a similar fate.

At the request of the secretariat, the Palestinian Authority withheld payment of this amount and is in the process of returning it to the Compensation Fund.

He contends that it has been satisfactorily established that the complainant was in fact subjected to torture after his return.

Thaksin s rural base rewarded him by returning him to power, ignoring his personal corruption.

In 2010 the by catch limit for loggerhead turtles was raised, but was restored to the former limit as a result of litigation.

4.11 Even if the allegations of apostasy were credible, they would not necessarily mean that the complainant would be in danger of being tortured if sent home to Pakistan.

The purpose of the exercise, however, is to determine whether the individual concerned would be personally at risk of being subjected to torture in the country to which he would return.

If he becomes indigent after receiving a residence permit, he cannot automatically be returned to his home country, as was possible before.

As one legal historian wrote, Justinian consciously looked back to the golden age of Roman law and aimed to restore it to the peak it had reached three centuries before.

On 12 July 2001, the complainant lodged an appeal with the Limoges Administrative Court against the deportation order and the decision to return him to his country of origin.

that, as a result, his request for the annulment of the decision to return him to his State of origin taken by the Prefect of Indre on 23 May 2001 is well founded.

According to the State party, however, the complainant had produced no evidence before either the administrative court or the administrative authorities to substantiate his alleged fears about being returned to Algeria.

Similarly, the assertion by the complainant that he is in danger of being tortured by the police and condemned to death if sent back to Pakistan are contradicted by the Committee's observations concerning the risks of arrest.

In February 2011, he was briefly hospitalised with a respiratory infection, attracting international attention, before being re hospitalised for a lung infection and gallstone removal in December 2012.

Counsel emphasizes, however, that no arrangements had been made prior to expulsion as to how the guarantees in question would be implemented after the complainant's return to Egypt.

Before determining Algeria as the country to which he should be deported, the Prefect of Indre had conducted a further review of the risks he would run if returned to that country.

3.1 It is claimed that the complainant's forced repatriation to Bangladesh would violate his rights under article 3 of the Convention, as there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture.

With regard to the Committee's case law, it cannot be supposed that the French authorities could reasonably have considered that he would be exposed to real danger in the event of being sent home when they decided to enforce the deportation order against him.

He claims that his forced repatriation to Algeria constitutes a violation by France of article 3 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.

His application was rejected, and he maintains that sending him back to Pakistan would constitute a violation by Switzerland of article 3 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.

At the end of the June 2002 visit, Embassy staff observed the complainant in seemingly relaxed conversation with several prison guards, awaiting return to detention.

They have to drill holes in the ice, dive down into the water cold, cold water to get hold of the instrument, bring it up, do any repairs and maintenance that they need to do, put it back and get out before the ice melts.

(d) Ensure compliance with the requirements of article 3, including the proper test of proof, or the risk of torture, when determining whether to expel, return or extradite a person to another State

The State party refers to the Committee's case law whereby it is the responsibility of an individual who claims he would be in danger if sent back to a specific country to show, at least beyond reasonable doubt, that his fears are serious.

The State party alludes to the Committee's case law holding that an individual claiming to be in danger if returned to a specific country is responsible, at least beyond reasonable doubt, for establishing that his fears are substantial.

It believes that the complainant's statements emphatically do not suggest there are substantial grounds for believing, in keeping with article 3, paragraph 1, of the Convention, that the complainant would be in danger of being tortured if sent back to Pakistan.

6.3 The Committee must decide, as called for in article 3, paragraph 1, of the Convention, whether there are substantial grounds for believing that the complainant would be in danger of being subjected to torture if sent back to Pakistan.

It requires a sense of the medium term and a commitment to rational debate of issues, for one tradition that can be revived that of enlightened thinking is the most important of all.

The students were supporters of the Islamic Revolution who occupied the embassy to show their support for Ayatollah Khomeini and their outrage that the ex Shah of Iran was admitted to the United States for cancer treatment, instead of being returned to Iran for trial and execution.

Also urges States not to expel, return (refouler), extradite or in any other way transfer a person to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that the person would be in danger of being subjected to torture

Do your country's competent authorities facilitate and accept, without undue or unreasonable delay, the return of a smuggled migrant who is a national of, or has the right of permanent residence in, your country at the time of his her return (art. 18, para. 1, of the Protocol)?

He moved to Mexico for financial reasons, where he resided until the return of democracy in 1958, when the democratically elected President Rómulo Betancourt called him back to government service to finish the job he had begun under the presidency of Gallegos, this time as Minister of Energy.

True, once the inflation genie is let out of the bottle, it could take several years to put it back in. No one wants to relive the anti inflation fights of the 1980 s and 1990 s.

1. Each State Party agrees to facilitate and accept, without undue or unreasonable delay, the return of a person who has been the object of conduct set forth in article 6 of this Protocol and who is its national or who has the right of permanent residence in its territory at the time of return.

In 2000, concerned that improving relations between Egypt and Iran would result in his being returned to Egypt, the complainant and his family bought air tickets, using Saudi Arabian identities, to Canada, and claimed asylum during a transit stop in Stockholm on 23 September 2000.

9.1 The Committee must determine whether the expulsion of the complainant to Spain violated the State party's obligation under article 3, paragraph 1, of the Convention not to expel or return ( refouler ) an individual to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he or she would be in danger of being subjected to torture.

9.2 The Committee must determine whether the expulsion of the complainant to Spain constituted a failure by the State party to fulfil its obligation under that article not to expel or return ( refouler ) an individual to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he or she would be in danger of being subjected to torture.

The Committee has also stressed that for article 3 of the Convention to apply, the individual concerned must face a foreseeable and real risk of being subjected to torture in the country to which he she is being returned, and that this danger must be personal and present b and that invoking a general situation or certain specific cases is not sufficient.

They know how to bring it back, and they know how to bring it back because they have demystified one big myth, which is the myth of spontaneity, which is that it's just going to fall from heaven while you're folding the laundry like a deus ex machina, and in fact they understood that whatever is going to just happen in a long term relationship already has.

8.8 In the State party's view, by the day the deportation order was enforced, the complainant's situation must be said to have been fairly reviewed without his showing that he would be in serious and present danger of torture or inhuman treatment if returned to Algeria.

Decides further that the provisions for the applications of credits under regulations 3.2 (d), 5.3 and 5.4 of the Financial Regulations of the United Nations shall be suspended in respect of the amount of 21,012,700 dollars gross (21,962,900 dollars net), which otherwise would have to be surrendered pursuant to those provisions