At the same meeting, a statement was made by Stavros Dimas, Commissioner for Environment of the European Commission, as the first respondent.

A representative of Japan, as first respondent, called for the integration of risk reduction and preparedness strategies into land use and urban planning.

(b) To advise both the appellant and the respondent as stated above, the Administrative Law Unit represents the respondent at all stages of the appeals process.

Upon challenge by the respondent, the arbitration tribunal declared not to have any jurisdiction as in its views the respondent had validly terminated the arbitration agreement.

Before the Court could decide on the application, the respondent nominated an arbitrator.

In turn, the plaintiff brought an incidental warranty action in appeal against the respondent.

While the claimant and the respondent had signed the arbitration agreement, a company (the sole shareholder of the respondent), the individual shareholders of that company, and the wholly owned subsidiaries of the claimant had not.

The respondent objected, invoking the Polish judgment and the lack of a valid arbitration agreement.

Summoning of the victim, witness, civil plaintiff, civil respondent, their representatives and experts (article 476)

Donald Inc. (the respondent) in order to obtain reimbursement of part of the ticket price.

Such an order was granted but subsequently, following a motion of the respondent, set aside.

The applicant cooperated with the Commission and was not cited as a respondent in the case.

The Court rejected the application and concluded that the respondent was still bound by the arbitration agreement.

It finally asserted that the respondent had waived its right to arbitration by commencing a Builder's Lien action.

The Court of Appeal directed that all issues between the claimant and the respondent be referred to arbitration.

The respondent in the arbitral proceedings was one of the founding partners of a Limited Partnership (hereinafter LP).

The respondent objected that the claimant was barred, because the matter had already been settled by the arbitral award.

The respondent (hereinafter the appellant ) appealed against an order of the Trial Division declaring a foreign arbitral award enforceable.

The Court acknowledged that the respondent was not time barred to raise defences against enforcement, since the three month period only started to run when the award was formally served on the respondent and registered with the German Courts, as required under the old law.

There are often much deeper psychological considerations, that even the respondent may not be aware of this is not true.

So, a respondent who is primarily using this schema will focus on what is best for society as a whole.

(c) Representation of the respondent before the Board when a staff member requests suspension of action of an administrative decision

For example, 65 per cent of respondent countries applied the absolute concept of poverty, while about one third did not.

The respondent opposed this declaration and asked the Court to reject the claimant's application to declare the tribunal's temporary injunction enforceable.

Another respondent indicated that current conditions in the country would make it difficult to introduce the principles in the immediate future.

Any person who has an interest in the property would be notified and would be entitled to be a respondent to the application.

Following the suspension, the German Track and Field Federation (DLV hereinafter the respondent), rejected his application to participate in a German championship tournament.

Some respondent States provided information on decisions adopted by national courts recognizing the connection between human rights and the protection of the environment.

The claimant served a notice of default under the joint venture agreement on the ground that the respondent was in breach of the agreement.

The claimant argued that the respondent had taken a step in the proceedings when it served a request for discovery of documents in the action.

Some information on the country coverage of questionnaires is included in annex I. Also, not all questionnaires are sent to a single respondent in a country.

The claimant (main contractor) appealed against the decision of a lower court, which had referred various disputes between the claimant and the respondent (sub contractor) to arbitration.

The Commission referred the case to the Competition Tribunal, recommending that a fine of up to 10 per cent of the turnover of each respondent be imposed.

Subsequently, the respondent States in those cases all submitted preliminary objections relating to the Court's jurisdiction to entertain the case and to the admissibility of the Application.

The respondent, pursuant to article V (1) (a) of the New York Convention consistent with article 36 (1) (a) (i) MAL objected that the agreement was invalid.

The number of pleadings could also increase as a result of the raising of counterclaims by a respondent or the intervention of a State in a pending case.

In the current text, the claimant State could institute proceedings on behalf of any citizen of the respondent State, which would adversely affect the sovereignty of the latter.

So, a respondent who is predominantly using this schema will take into consideration what needs to be done in order to be compliant with the social order of society.

The ensuing dispute concerning this decision led to a temporary injunction by a DLV arbitral tribunal ordering the respondent to authorize the claimant to take part in the tournament.

At the same time the Court deemed that the claimant, by obeying the procedural terms set up by the respondent, had refrained from pursuing its rights before State Courts.

So, when a respondent reads an issue statement that both makes sense to them, as well as triggers a preferred schema, that statement is given a high rating and ranking.

The respondent, Satnam Vaid, was the driver of the Speaker of the House of Commons. He filed a complaint of discrimination based on race with the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

This stage is an absolute necessity, without which there can be no meaningful advice to managers, no reasonable review of the administrative decision and no complete reply from the respondent.

(Claim by United Nations General Service staff member that the Respondent apos s failure to classify her functions at the G 7 level resulted in a violation of her rights)

The dispute arose out of a charter party entered into by the claimant and the respondent, providing for arbitration under the rules of the German Maritime Arbitration Association (GMAA) in Hamburg.