Decisions on inadmissibility

Procedural issues Inadmissibility ratione materiae

Procedural issues Inadmissibility under article 2 of the Protocol

Procedural issues Inadmissibility ratione materiae non exhaustion of domestic remedies

Reaffirming the principle of the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force,

Affirming the principle of the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war,

Affirming the principle of the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war,

See communication No. 842 1998, Romanov v. Ukraine, inadmissibility decision of 30 October 2003.

See communication No. 541 1993, Simms v. Jamaica, inadmissibility decision of 3 April 1995.

The Council revoked the inadmissibility decision and later admitted the petition of 30 March 1971.

See communication No. 541 1993, Errol Simms v. Jamaica, inadmissibility decision of 3 April 1995, para.

See communication No. 788 1997, Gobin v. Mauritius, decision of inadmissibility adopted on 16 July 2001, para.

Inadmissibility of certain practices that contribute to fuelling contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance

See, for example, communication No. 842 1998, Sergei Romanov v. Ukraine, inadmissibility decision adopted on 30 October 2003.

Inadmissibility of certain practices that contribute to fuelling contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance

Subject to paragraph 4 above, the Committee's decisions on inadmissibility, the merits and discontinuance shall be made public.

Inadmissibility of certain practices that contribute to fuelling contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance

Inadmissibility of certain practices that contribute to fuelling contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance 28

For this reason, the State party invokes the grounds for inadmissibility contained in article 3 of the Optional Protocol.

62 142. Inadmissibility of certain practices that contribute to fuelling contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance

60 143. Inadmissibility of certain practices that contribute to fuelling contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance

61 147. Inadmissibility of certain practices that contribute to fuelling contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance

Inadmissibility of certain practices that contribute to fuelling contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance 6 27

Guided by the principles of the Charter of the United Nations, and affirming the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force,

Guided by the principles of the Charter of the United Nations, and affirming the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force,

Guided by the principles of the Charter of the United Nations, and affirming the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force,

Guided by the principles of the Charter of the United Nations, and affirming the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force,

The authors, firstly, rely on the Committee's decision in Singer to reject any ground of inadmissibility on the grounds of corporate rights.

Racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance (Inadmissibility of certain practices that contribute to fuelling contemporary forms of) (resolution 2005 5) 27

This fits with United Nations Security Council resolutions, among them Number 242, which stated the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war.

Draft resolution I is entitled Inadmissibility of certain practices that contribute to fuelling contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance .

(k) Substantiation The OP to CEDAW also determines the inadmissibility of a communication when it is manifestly ill founded or not sufficiently substantiated .

Guided by the principles set forth in the Charter of the United Nations, and affirming the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force,

Reaffirming the fundamental principle of the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force, in accordance with international law and the Charter of the United Nations,

Draft resolution A C.3 60 L.60 Inadmissibility of certain practices that contribute to fuelling contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance

Such written request shall contain evidence to the effect that the reasons for inadmissibility referred to in article 22, paragraph 5, of the Convention no longer apply.

6.3 The Committee has taken note of the State party's arguments concerning the inadmissibility of the complaint ratione temporis and the comments by the authors on this subject.

The State party concludes that there is no reason for challenge proceedings, and invokes article 3 of the Optional Protocol as grounds for the inadmissibility of the communication.

Such written request shall contain documentary evidence to the effect that the reasons for inadmissibility referred to in paragraph 7 (a) of article 14 are no longer applicable.

The Special Rapporteur clearly preferred the words validity invalidity , which were entirely neutral, to the other terms proposed, such as admissibility inadmissibility , permissibility impermissibility or opposability non opposability , which had strong doctrinal connotations.

The Committee has consistently decided that only individuals can submit a communication, and the inadmissibility of the communication does not have an impact on the scope of article 19's protection of commercial speech.

Finally, the authors argue that if this ground of inadmissibility were to be accepted, it would exclude almost all commercial expression from Covenant protection, as most people engaged in trade do so through the vehicle of a corporation.

9.3 As to the State party's inadmissibility argument grounded on rule 107 (f) of the Committee's rules of procedure, the Committee observed that this rule required the delay in submission to have made consideration of the case unduly difficult .

Recalling the advisory opinion rendered on 9 July 2004 by the International Court of Justice and General Assembly resolution ES 10 15 of 20 July 2004, and reaffirming the principle of the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force,

Urges all Member States signatories to the Fourth Geneva Convention to express the inadmissibility of the ongoing violation of the rights of Palestinian civilians, especially women and children, stipulated in these instruments, and to demand their effective observance by Israel, the occupying Power