Reparation

Reparation for injury

Forms of reparation

Reparation for harm suffered

Reparation for harm suffered

Reparation for harm suffered

IX. Reparation for harm suffered

In cases where a person, a legal person, or other entity is found liable for reparation to a victim, such party should provide reparation to the victim or compensate the State if the State has already provided reparation to the victim.

In cases where a person, a legal person, or other entity is found liable for reparation to a victim, such party should provide reparation to the victim or compensate the State if the State has already provided reparation to the victim.

In cases where a person, a legal person, or other entity is found liable for reparation to a victim, such party should provide reparation to the victim or compensate the State if the State has already provided reparation to the victim.

There were, however, many ways in which reparation could be made.

5. The right to obtain reparation referred to in paragraph 4 of this article covers material and moral damages and, where appropriate, other forms of reparation such as

In addition to individual access to justice, States should endeavour to develop procedures to allow groups of victims to present claims for reparation and to receive reparation, as appropriate.

In addition to individual access to justice, States should endeavour to develop procedures to allow groups of victims to present claims for reparation and to receive reparation, as appropriate.

In addition to individual access to justice, States should endeavour to develop procedures to allow groups of victims to present claims for reparation and to receive reparation, as appropriate.

13. In addition to individual access to justice, States should endeavour to develop procedures to allow groups of victims to present claims for reparation and to receive reparation, as appropriate.

Access to relevant information concerning violations AND REPARATION MECHANISMS

(b) Adequate, effective and prompt reparation for harm suffered

Access to relevant information concerning violations and reparation mechanisms

(b) What form reparation should take in accordance with the provisions of part two.

Some delegations were opposed to the inclusion of an unlimited right to reparation, pointing out that the question of non State actors had yet to be settled, or that their domestic law recognized a right to seek reparation rather than a right to reparation itself.

X. Access to relevant information concerning violations and reparation mechanisms

It may also include other means of reparation such as

(b) Adequate, effective and prompt reparation for harm suffered and

(c) Access to relevant information concerning violations and reparation mechanisms.

In the determination of reparation, account shall be taken of the contribution to the injury by wilful or negligent action or omission of the injured State or any person or entity in relation to whom reparation is sought.

(d) Provide effective remedies to victims, including reparation, as described below.

(d) Provide effective remedies to victims, including reparation, as described below.

Several participants suggested adding references to victims' rights to justice and reparation.

Reparation has emerged as an important consideration in developed and developing countries and has implications for both domestic and international criminal justice proceedings. In Southern Africa, reparation programmes have been developed to respond to the needs of victims of human rights violations.

States shall, with respect to claims by victims, enforce domestic judgements for reparation against individuals or entities liable for the harm suffered and endeavour to enforce valid foreign legal judgements for reparation in accordance with domestic law and international legal obligations.

States shall, with respect to claims by victims, enforce domestic judgements for reparation against individuals or entities liable for the harm suffered and endeavour to enforce valid foreign legal judgements for reparation in accordance with domestic law and international legal obligations.

The right to obtain reparation referred to in paragraph 4 includes full compensation for material and psychological harm.

The overall criterion is always that of effective reparation for the wrongful act.

Other delegations, however, preferred that the types of reparation provided for in subparagraphs (a) to (d) should remain optional.

Had any degree of reparation been made to those who had lost their families?

Then came the turn of Henry Theriault from the Armenian Genocide Reparation Study Group.

Reparation should be proportional to the gravity of the violations and the harm suffered.

(c) Making available adequate, effective, prompt and appropriate remedies, including reparation, as defined below

Reparation should be proportional to the gravity of the violations and the harm suffered.

Others spoke in favour of the converse solution, arguing among other things that full reparation could not actually be guaranteed.

(c) Making available adequate, effective, prompt, and appropriate remedies, including reparation, as defined below and

It was also proposed that States should be given greater flexibility in determining who was a victim and what was meant by reparation.

The Commission emphasizes the importance of truth, justice and reparation in a comprehensive peace strategy that should lead to reconciliation and lasting peace.

To that end, States should provide under their domestic laws effective mechanisms for the enforcement of reparation judgements.