Paragraph 66, second sentence

The second sentence should be deleted.

Paragraph 152, second sentence

Paragraph 44, second sentence

(3) The label conforming to the colouring scheme in the table for oxidizing liquids may be used until 1 January 2011. .

A majority of the delegations would like to see both the words within square brackets in the first sentence and the bracketed second sentence deleted.

One delegation wished to delete only the second sentence of the article.

3.10.3.3.1.1 A mixture which contains a total of 10 or more of a substance or substances classified in Category 1, and has a kinematic viscosity of 20.5 mm2 s or less, measured at 40 C, will be classified in Category 1.

89. In former paragraph 27C.12, replace the second sentence with the following text

In the second sentence, add Iceland to the list of additional sponsors of the draft resolution

A majority of these delegations have come to the conclusion that the obligation to stow, lash and secure the goods inside a container in the second sentence is already covered by the more general obligation in the first sentence.

The second sentence is proposed within square brackets as it may prove unnecessary since the first sentence provides that the arbitration agreement may cover disputes that have arisen or that may arise between the parties.

The second sentence of this article relating to liability is dealt with in the paragraphs 46 to 48 of this questionnaire.

In the second sentence of paragraph 1.3, after the control and limitation of documents, add in accordance with legislative mandates, .

Another reason for retaining the second sentence is that containers are subject to specific regulation elsewhere in the draft.

One new element in the draft article was the second sentence of paragraph 2, which had given rise to extensive debate.

(c) After the seventh sentence, add the following sentence

Insert the following new table for Aspiration hazard after current table for Specific target organ systemic toxicity (repeated exposure)

The text of the second sentence of draft article 74 should be corrected by replacing the phrase This article does not constitute with the phrase Nothing in chapter 15 constitutes

In the second sentence of paragraph 25.4, replace ensure with assist .

In the table for Specific target organ systemic toxicity (single exposure)

Causes damage to organs (or state all organs affected, if known) through prolonged or repeated exposure (state route of exposure if it is conclusively proven that no other routes of exposure cause the hazard) .

After the second sentence, the following new sentence should be inserted In this respect, we recommend that the Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice request that the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime prepare a draft of a United Nations convention on extradition and mutual legal assistance.

(a) In the second sentence, replace collection, analysis and interpretation of data with the words collection and analysis of data

In this article and in the second sentence of article 46, the liability of the carrier for loss or damage to the goods is dealt with in cases when the goods are undeliverable.

In the second sentence, after This goal , insert , while taking into account the new organization and programme of work of the Commission on Sustainable Development with regard to the regional implementation forum, .

Delete the final sentence.

Delete the last sentence.

At the end of the second sentence, add as well as at the seventh special session of the Governing Council of UNEP, held in Cartagena, and the World Summit on Sustainable Development .

In the second sentence, replace , using the Millennium Declaration as its guide with of the medium term plan and of the Millennium Declaration (General Assembly resolution 55 2) .

He couldn't understand the sentence.

He couldn't understand the sentence.

There is a mistake in the sentence.

This phrase is incomprehensible.

The sentence should read

Paragraph 11, first sentence

The middle part of the second sentence should read to consider ratifying or acceding to and implementing the provisions of instead of to ratify or accede to and implement the provisions of .

Translate this sentence into English.

What does this Esperanto sentence mean?

Which sentence do you prefer?

You have to memorize this sentence.

Paragraph 152, first sentence

This sentence states exactly how the writer feels.

This sentence doesn't make sense.

I don't want to translate this sentence.