You call for a revolution, and I welcome your proposition.

We did not think that its wings had had a chance to fully extend themselves, and we just focused on your proposal as amended by the Non Aligned Movement.

I think what we have before us is a United States proposal, not a proposal by the Chairman you hinted, Sir, at dropping non proliferation at the end of your proposal.

That is your proposal as I understand it, and on that basis I think we can make some additional progress, depending on how the formulations of the other agenda items turn out.

Mr. Bravaco (United States of America) Perhaps it would be best, Sir, if you read out your own proposal, as you understand it to read now that I have suggested the deletion of what we proposed in the 8 July meeting, which was to have the word non proliferation at the end of the sentence.

I would just like to take the floor to say that we support the proposal that you have made to organize a discussion on different themes that have been mentioned for the forthcoming meetings of the Conference, with the understanding, of course, that the purpose of this discussion and of raising any other issue which may be raised in the course of these would be to try to move towards an agreement on the programme of work.